Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-08-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is?

What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, most of the humans believe in fresh or newly products rather than using recycle process for own things as many time they can do. This essay will discuss the reason for not doing recycle and the solution for this problem.

There are number of reasons for not believing reuses. To begin with, the production of every items has been increasing day-by-day in all industries departments. To explain this, the grown of technology helps to manufacture product by saving time and quality accuracy. In this way, customer can get every item effortlessly and in a low rate because of higher production. Moreover, some people believe that by doing recycle, the quality of product is getting bad and it would be not work as it was fresh and new. For example , the color of notebook's pages is getting yellow because of doing recycle more than three times.

On the other hand, this problem can be address by influencing people about importance of reusing. Government should set rules about recycle for residents and it must be follow by everyone. If someone break their rules then they will be fined by authority. Furthermore, people who are doing recycle, should be rewarded by the rulling party. For instance, In chine people get rewarded by government if they use plastic again and again.

In conclusion, people do not believe in recycle because they think the quality of getting low and they can easily purchase any product very easily. However, this can be address by government by set rules and awarded people who believes in recycle.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The essay addresses both parts of the prompt: reasons for low recycling rates and potential solutions. The ideas are relevant, such as the convenience of new products and the perception of lower quality in recycled goods. However, the development is somewhat limited. For instance, the explanation regarding 'grown of technology' is slightly unclear, and the solutions could be more deeply explored beyond government intervention. The position is clear throughout, but the depth of analysis remains at a basic level, which prevents it from reaching a higher band. To improve, ensure that each point is supported by more detailed reasoning or specific, well-explained examples.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'To begin with,' 'Moreover,' and 'On the other hand,' which help guide the reader. However, some transitions feel mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'In this way' or 'To explain this.' Additionally, there are instances where the flow between sentences is slightly disjointed. Paragraphing is used appropriately, but the internal cohesion within paragraphs could be improved by using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring that referencing is consistently clear throughout the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, allowing the writer to convey their ideas clearly. There are attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary like 'industries departments' and 'authority,' though some word choices are imprecise or non-standard, such as 'fresh or newly products' instead of 'new products' or 'fresh goods.' The phrase 'rulling party' is also a spelling error. While the range is sufficient to communicate the main points, it lacks the flexibility and precision required for a higher band. Focusing on collocations and more natural phrasing would significantly enhance the quality of the writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the reader's flow. Examples include 'most of the humans believe,' 'production of every items,' 'grown of technology,' and 'it would be not work.' Subject-verb agreement and article usage are inconsistent. While the meaning is generally clear, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar prevents a higher score. To improve, focus on proofreading for common errors like pluralization, verb forms, and the correct use of articles, as well as practicing more complex sentence structures with greater accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.