Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-08-18

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is?

What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

In contemporary society, litter has sparked considerable debate. Many people are unable to throw or recycle their litter as possible as they could. While, some individuals contend that the amount of waste we have produce has increased, others hold an alternative viewpoint is that it can be done to change the way we are doing. This essay will address both questions and provide my perspective on the matter.

To begin with, the amount of household waste is growing rapidly, it is the most threatening issue the world faces today. Not only avoid to use plastic goods in house but also water bottles and unnecessary items. So, we can recycle that rubbish as much as possible. As an epitome, government should be stricter about waste produced by companies such as, plastic bags, plastic water battle, food packets and many more. Consequently, recycling saves money and raw materials.

Regarding the second question, I believe that government should change strict rules and regulations towards using plastic items like, paper, glass, factory waste and many more waste. Moreover, it can possible that pollute the natural habitats so, it should avoid to use rather than recycling that all items. For instance, in many countries, governments are provide garbage bins for several usage to separate waste. Therefore, they should not use as much packaging.

To recapitulate, there are several way to stop unwanted rubbish or recycling products is that governments should take strict rules, stop producing by companies and that would be beneficial for natural habitats and state of living life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt—reasons for low recycling rates and potential solutions—but the development is inconsistent. The ideas are often presented in a fragmented manner, such as the list of items in the second paragraph, which lacks sufficient explanation or logical connection to the broader argument. While a position is stated, the reasoning is frequently unclear or underdeveloped. For instance, the suggestion that governments should 'change strict rules' is vague. To improve, you should focus on fully explaining each point with clear examples rather than listing items or making general statements. The response meets the minimum length requirement, but the depth of analysis needs to be significantly increased to reach a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The essay is organised into paragraphs, but the flow of ideas is often disjointed. While some cohesive devices are used, such as 'To begin with', 'Consequently', and 'To recapitulate', they are sometimes used incorrectly or do not effectively link the sentences. For example, the transition 'As an epitome' is misused, and the connection between the problem of waste and the proposed solutions is often weak. The referencing is occasionally unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the progression of your argument. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring each paragraph has a clear, singular focus would greatly enhance the coherence of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is limited and sometimes inaccurate, which occasionally impedes communication. You rely on basic terms and struggle with collocations, such as 'throw or recycle their litter as possible as they could' and 'change strict rules'. There are also errors in word choice, such as 'epitome' used incorrectly to mean 'example' or 'instance'. While you attempt to use some topic-related vocabulary like 'natural habitats' and 'raw materials', the overall range is insufficient to express complex ideas precisely. To improve, focus on learning common collocations and using more precise terminology related to environmental issues.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that affect clarity. Issues include subject-verb agreement ('government should be stricter', 'governments are provide'), incorrect verb forms ('avoid to use'), and awkward phrasing ('the amount of waste we have produce'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. While the meaning is generally understandable, the high frequency of errors prevents the text from reaching a higher band. You should focus on mastering basic sentence construction, specifically ensuring that verbs are correctly conjugated and that prepositions are used appropriately.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.