Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-08-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is?

What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In this modern era, the majority of individuals do not throw their waste for recycling because of lack of government services and less convenient but it can be easily change with the help of good public services as well as rules and regulations.

First and foremost, numerous people throw their plastic materials into the garbage instead of recycle these things because government do not provide separate bins for recycle which creates this problem in different areas. Secondly, most of the people are busy in their hectic schedules and the places of recycling bins are far away from societies which results people don not want to waste their time for these things so they do not prefer to recycle their home waste. For instance, the survey was conducted by Oxford University in which they stated that 70 percent of people in cities did less recycle than other areas people because there was less recycle bins in the cities.

To solve this problem, authorities should provide bins in all the living areas to collect the recycle waste from societies. Moreover, gorverment should also send the list of rules and regulations in which people can learn about how to recycle their home waste on time. Furthermore, there will be set an amount of fines to those people who throw their rubbish in waste which is best way to solve the situation.

To conclude, people do not recycle their waste because of less government facilities and lack of knowledge which can be solve by providing rules and regulations to individuals as well as take strict action who is obeying the rules.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: reasons for low recycling rates and potential solutions. The ideas are relevant, such as the lack of infrastructure and the convenience factor. However, the development is somewhat limited. For example, the suggestion to 'send the list of rules' is a bit vague and could be expanded to explain how education or awareness campaigns actually change behavior. The position is clear throughout, but the depth of analysis is more characteristic of a Band 5.5 or 6.0, as the arguments are presented in a somewhat simplistic manner without fully exploring the implications of the proposed solutions.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'First and foremost,' 'Secondly,' 'Moreover,' and 'To conclude.' However, the use of these devices is sometimes mechanical or slightly repetitive. There are also issues with referencing; for instance, 'which creates this problem' is a bit vague in its connection to the previous clause. While the progression of ideas is generally easy to follow, the flow between sentences could be smoother to achieve a higher band.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task but lacks the range and precision required for a higher band. There is some repetition of basic terms like 'recycle,' 'waste,' and 'bins.' Some collocations are slightly unnatural, such as 'less convenient' (should be 'lack of convenience') and 'do not throw their waste for recycling' (should be 'do not recycle their waste'). The attempt to use more formal language is present, but the overall lexical range remains limited to common, everyday words. To improve, you should incorporate more topic-specific vocabulary related to environmental sustainability.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay contains a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede the flow of reading. Examples include 'less convenient but it can be easily change' (should be 'changed'), 'government do not provide' (subject-verb agreement error), and 'results people don not want' (should be 'results in people not wanting'). Punctuation is generally functional, but there are minor errors in sentence construction. While the meaning is usually clear, the frequency of these errors prevents the essay from reaching a higher band score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.