Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-08-21
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.
Why do you think this is?
What can be done to change this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
In several foreign nations, many individuals don't want to throw away their old belongings as much as possible. In this essay, I will share my thoughts on why they do so and what some ways are to avoid this kind of situation.
In today's fast-growing nations, many people don't want to throw away their rubbish because they believe it holds memories of their loved ones. They want to keep each and every item with them as a memory. For instance, they want that they things to be aesthetic but they are garbage as no one is able to use these old things in today's world. In fact, this thing is not happening in one country. But people in many nations are dealing with king of problem. Individuals just purchase new things for their home but they are recycling rubbish from their house. They just want to keep everything in a small area and it becomes even more congested.
Bot on the flip side, there are some ways to change this king is issues. Firstly, people need to think about their blood relations with whom they are currently living because with their habit of not recycling their belongings that are not in use, everyone can get stressed. they need to move on. Moreover, there are many more new things in the market that they can replace the items with and make new memories with new things.
In conclusion, individuals in numerous nations need to recycle the used things as much as they can.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response addresses both parts of the prompt, but the development of ideas is weak and often confusing. The argument that people do not recycle because they hold 'memories' of items is a narrow interpretation of the topic, which is generally understood to refer to waste management and environmental recycling. The essay lacks depth, and the reasoning is frequently unclear, such as the claim that keeping items causes stress for 'blood relations.' The response fails to provide a clear, logical position on the broader issue of recycling, resulting in an underdeveloped argument that does not fully meet the requirements of the task.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The essay is organised into paragraphs, but the progression of ideas is disjointed. While some cohesive devices are used, such as 'Firstly' and 'Moreover,' they are often applied to illogical arguments. Referencing is frequently unclear; for example, the phrase 'this thing is not happening in one country' is vague and lacks a clear antecedent. The transition between the problem and the solution is abrupt, and the overall flow of the essay is hindered by repetitive phrasing and a lack of logical connection between sentences.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and repetitive, relying on basic terms like 'things,' 'old,' and 'rubbish.' There are several instances of awkward word choice and incorrect collocations, such as 'king of problem' (likely a typo for 'kind of') and 'blood relations.' The range of vocabulary is insufficient to express complex ideas effectively. The student struggles to use precise terminology related to the topic of recycling or environmental sustainability, which restricts the ability to convey a sophisticated argument.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede communication. There are issues with subject-verb agreement, such as 'they want that they things to be aesthetic,' and sentence fragments or run-on sentences. The range of structures is limited, consisting mostly of simple sentences with some attempts at complex ones that are often faulty. Punctuation is inconsistent, and there are several typographical errors, such as 'Bot' instead of 'But' and 'king' instead of 'kind,' which suggest a lack of proofreading.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.