Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Smoking can cause serious illnesses and should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

somoking is the real cause of lungs cancer , therefore some people believe that cigrates should be banned in everywhere. i strongly agree with this statement and believe that consumption of tabo leads to serious illnesses .

Firstly , consumption of cigarettes are dangerously effective the human body . either a person who is addicted to smoking or person who's consumed it occasionally are having same serious illnesses such lungs cancer and breathing difficulties. the smoke produced form cigarette are directly attacked to lungs and cause serious problems . for example , it commonly seems for recent deaths , that smoking is main cause of life threatening diseases.the government should be aware the people about it effects and try to orgniaze event to aware the people.

on the other side , banning it from the market is strong and effective way , for the authroties to save public health . if the product is not available in the market , people stopped to use and they will try find alternative , which are not dangerous for health . To illustrate , not avialablity of cigrattes in market , directly effect the consumers who are effected and to deals with its addiction people will strater connecting to doctor for find an alternate whuch are les dangreous . complete ban indirectly save many preious life .

to conculde , smoking is ingreous to health in every way , complete removal will helps to make healthier communites and people can contributes for the country.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position on whether smoking should be made illegal. The writer strongly agrees with the statement, arguing that tobacco consumption leads to serious illnesses and that a complete ban would protect public health. Ideas are introduced and supported with general examples, such as the link between smoking and lung cancer, as well as the potential outcome of banning the product on consumer behavior. However, the development of ideas tends to be repetitive and somewhat generalized. For instance, the discussion on how authorities can help smokers find alternatives lacks specific elaboration. While the prompt is adequately addressed, the arguments would benefit from greater depth and more precise real-world examples to reach a higher band level.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt at paragraphing, separating the introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. There is a logical progression of ideas moving from the health effects of smoking in the first body paragraph to the benefits of a market ban in the second. However, cohesion is often faulty and mechanical, with frequent misuse of cohesive devices such as "on the other side" instead of "on the other hand". Referencing is occasionally unclear, and punctuation errors around paragraph connectors disrupt the smooth flow of the text. Paragraphing is present, but internal transitions between sentences can feel abrupt, making the overall structure less fluid than required for higher bands.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully incorporating topic-specific terms such as "consumption," "addiction," "breathing difficulties," and "public health." However, there are numerous spelling errors throughout the response, including "somoking" for smoking, "cigrates" for cigarettes, "tabo" for tobacco, "orgniaze" for organize, "avialablity" for availability, and "ingreous" for injurious. Furthermore, word choice and collocations are occasionally awkward or inaccurate, such as "dangerously effective" instead of "dangerously affect" and "preious life" instead of "precious lives." These lexical errors and frequent misspellings occasionally strain the reader, though communication remains mostly intact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing conditional structures like "if the product is not available in the market, people stopped to use..." and relative clauses. However, grammatical accuracy is weak, with frequent errors in verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and tense consistency. Examples include "consumption of cigarettes are dangerously effective" (instead of 'is dangerously affecting'), "person who's consumed" (instead of 'who consume'), and "smoke produced form cigarette are directly attacked" (instead of 'is directly attacking'). Punctuation and capitalization are also problematic, with multiple missing capital letters at the beginning of sentences and improper spacing around commas. These persistent errors frequently cause difficulty for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.