Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There has been an ongoing debate about whether zoos should be closed or not. Some people believe that there is no need to keep animals inside zoos, therefore it should not be shutdown. Although there are some benefits of it, I strongly disagree with the statement. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons and relevant examples of this.

The primary reason why I hold this view is that human safety. To explain more, a number of animals which are very dangerous in behaviour such as lion, tiger, and many wild animals. If there live outside of zoos with normal residents in the same area, it will high risk for them to commute. Moreover, some animals eat humans as their main food. Therefore, I believe that it is more safe for everyone to keep animals in the places where no humans live to protect human safety.

Another compelling reason is that zoos are one of famous entertainment place for everybody, especially for children. People usually visit zoos on special occations with their family and friends because it provides significant amount of fun activities to the people. Zoos are not only renowned for entertainment purpose, bus also it offers excellent educational opportunities to learnes. For instance, many schools organize one day trip to visit zoos for children. Consequently, students can know more details about different animals.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that zoos should not be closed. This is mainly because human safety is paramount and zoos provide fun and education to the children.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you disagree with closing zoos, and the introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion maintain that view. You give two relevant reasons—protecting people from dangerous animals and providing entertainment and education—and the school-trip example supports the educational point. This addresses the task, but the reasons are not developed equally. The safety argument relies on a broad claim that animals might live near residents and eat people, without explaining how zoos specifically manage this risk or acknowledging that many animals are not dangerous. The entertainment point is also asserted more than explained. To strengthen the response, develop each reason with a specific example and explain why it supports keeping zoos open.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, each body paragraph presents a separate reason, and the conclusion restates your position. Linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “For instance” and “Consequently” help show relationships between ideas, and the progression is generally easy to follow. This is a solid organisational foundation. However, some connections feel mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “Therefore” and “Consequently,” and the opening sentence of the first body paragraph (“The primary reason why I hold this view is that human safety”) does not lead smoothly into its explanation. Some references, such as “it” in the introduction, are also unclear. Use more precise links between claims and examples, and make each paragraph’s central point explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including topic-related terms such as “dangerous,” “entertainment,” “educational opportunities” and “paramount.” There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, for example “Another compelling reason.” However, several word-choice and collocation errors make the writing less natural: “shutdown” is not the right form here, “famous entertainment place” is awkward, and “significant amount of fun activities” is imprecise. Spelling errors such as “occations” and “learnes” also reduce accuracy. Aim for natural combinations of words and check spelling carefully; a more precise range would help you express the arguments with greater clarity and flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure beginning “If there live outside of zoos” and a subordinate clause introduced by “because.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. For example, “The primary reason … is that human safety” needs a grammatical complement, and “If there live outside of zoos” has an incorrect clause structure. There are also issues with articles, agreement and sentence construction in “a number of animals which are very dangerous in behaviour such as lion, tiger” and “it provides significant amount.” Work on complete sentence patterns, subject–verb agreement, and article use. More accurate control of these structures would make your reasoning easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.