Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In the contemporary world, whether zoos need to be opened or closed has become a topic of discussion. While some people argue that zoos need to be closed as they keep animals in captivity, I believe zoos are necessary to maintain and protect endangered species, which require special care and assistance.

To begin with, many people are against zoos because they keep animals in cages without adequate space. They highlight that animals need freedom to move around and interact with the nature. Since some of the zoos are located in urban areas, it is hard to provide the necessary space for the animals to walk freely. Although, I agree with this statement, I don't believe closing down zoos entirely is the appropriate solution for this matter. I believe effective solution would be moving zoos to rural areas where those establishments can expand without any constraints.

One of the major reasons that I believe zoos should exist is that there are various endangered animals taken cared by zoos. Zoos are generally employing with veterinarians and trained professionals to handle and care such animals. without required care those species will extinct from the animal world. For instance, animals like Pandas usually considered as zoo only animals due to their lack of survival skills and limited food sources. If there is no zoos to taken care for them, those animals will become extinct.

In conclusion, some people argue that zoos should be closed because it can be detrimental for the freedom of animals. However, from my perspective, zoos should be kept open as there are some animals need such establishments to survive.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree with closing zoos because they can protect endangered species. You also acknowledge the opposing view about captivity and propose relocating zoos to rural areas, so the response addresses both the debate and your own stance. The panda example gives relevant support to your conservation argument. However, some ideas are less fully developed than others: the suggestion to move zoos is not supported with detail about how this would improve animal welfare, and the claim that pandas lack survival skills is broad and needs qualification or evidence. To strengthen the response further, explain how zoos contribute to conservation and distinguish responsible facilities from poorly managed ones.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, the body paragraphs present the opposing concern and your main reason, and the conclusion restates your position. Ideas generally progress logically, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “For instance,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. Some linking is less smooth or precise, however. “Although, I agree with this statement” interrupts the sentence’s flow, and “those animals” in the final sentence of the example paragraph could refer more clearly to pandas or endangered animals generally. Aim to connect each proposed solution directly to the point it answers, and use referencing that makes the relationship between ideas unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “captivity,” “endangered species,” “veterinarians,” and “survival skills,” which allows you to discuss the issue clearly. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “appropriate solution” and “necessary space.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, though: “taken cared by zoos,” “employing with veterinarians,” and “zoo only animals” do not express the intended meanings naturally. “Interact with the nature” also uses an unnecessary article. These choices do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision. Build accuracy by learning common word partnerships for animal care and conservation, and check whether a phrase sounds natural in context.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “species, which require special care” and a conditional sentence beginning “If there is no zoos.” Most ideas remain understandable, but some grammatical errors occur in sentence construction, agreement, articles, and verb forms. For example, “Although, I agree” has incorrect punctuation and placement, “without required care those species will extinct” needs a grammatical verb construction, and “there are some animals need such establishments” is missing a relative word. Capitalisation after the full stop before “without” also needs attention. Practise checking each sentence for a complete clause, correct subject–verb agreement, and appropriate articles; this will make your varied structures more reliable.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.