Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-08-02
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
It has been observed that society must required to have animals kept in wildlife park for long time so such places should be locked. If questioned I strongly agree with this statement. My inclination is justified in the ensuing paragraphs with valid reasons and approprite examples.
The first argument put forward for my stance is that freedom is basic right of every creature of god. No one have authority to stored any life. Animals enjoy their life through roam freely in the large space like forest or desert which is considered as their residence, the zoo not offers animals such comfort or space for wandering ; moreover, in the zoo animals treated as entertaintment tool. they just become toy of children. The motive of such lorganisation is only profit or earning. Animals are abused by visitors. Many children make animals irritate for enjoyment purpose. Consequently animels feel powerless and their growth become slow. They lost their interest from life.
Furthermore, for well mintain the ecological balance Animals can be more safe. Animals play fundemental role to maintain ecology. As per observation some special species of animals are an endengered so it is crucial to provides Animals more favorable environment and comfortable place to live ;moreover, some species are always live in group for instance elephants so it is unfair to kept then in cage.
To sumup, I completely agree with that community no longer needs to store animals in zoos so zoos should be prohibited becaus it affects the ecolygical bulance adversely; morover, freedom is right of every crieture so kept animals in perticular place is not fair decision.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response addresses the prompt and maintains a clear position throughout. The arguments regarding animal rights and ecological balance are relevant, though they are somewhat under-developed. For instance, the point about ecological balance is mentioned but not fully explained or linked back to the necessity of closing zoos. The ideas are present, but the supporting evidence is general rather than specific. To reach a higher band, you should expand on your points with more detailed examples or logical reasoning to fully explore the implications of your argument.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, and there is a logical progression of ideas. You use some cohesive devices such as 'furthermore', 'consequently', and 'to sum up', although some transitions feel a bit mechanical or repetitive. Referencing is occasionally unclear, such as in the second paragraph where the subject of the sentences shifts abruptly. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, body, and conclusion. To improve, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensuring that the relationship between sentences is more fluid.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is adequate for the task but shows limited range. There are several spelling errors (e.g., 'approprite', 'mintain', 'endengered', 'ecolygical') and some awkward collocations (e.g., 'locked' instead of 'closed', 'stored any life'). While the meaning is generally clear, the lack of precision and the frequent spelling mistakes prevent the essay from reaching a higher band. To improve, focus on learning the correct spelling of common academic words and practice using synonyms to avoid repeating basic terms like 'animals' or 'zoo'.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede readability. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('society must required', 'no one have authority'), incorrect verb forms ('to stored', 'to kept'), and punctuation errors. While the meaning is usually understandable, the high frequency of errors in basic grammar limits the score. To improve, focus on mastering subject-verb agreement and the correct use of infinitives and passive voice constructions.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.