Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-08-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

Zoos should be closed down, as it is believed that animals should be kept in zoos. I firmly disagree with the statement, and this essay will discuss how these zoos help in taking care of the animals and provide employment.

One of the most significant reasons to keep the zoos is the well-being of the animals. Animal parks are considered the safest place for the creatures when they get sick or injured while living in the jungle. For example, Vancouver zoo had adopted two of the cougar pups who were abandoned after their mom died in a road accident. They set free after they were taught forest life and given enough food to get healthy. As a result, zoos are not only providing life to the wildlife but also saving them from serious illness as well.

Furthermore, the wild parks are encouraging not only the wildlife but also the human life by providing them with employment opportunities. Zoos are proving themselves as the best place to work for those who are really interested in spending their lives with the animals. There are a number of zookeepers who enjoy spending time with the live stock while feeding them or nurturing them. Additionally, these places can be considered as a boon for the researchers or scholars. When they want to study or observe a specific species, they can easily contact zoo authorities to do their research on them and come up with some fantastic theory. Consequently, zoological gardens bring numerous employment opportunites for todays youth.

To conclude, I strongly believe that zoos are second homes for the injured or weak animals. It also invites a lot of work opportunities for today's generation as well as researchers to research. It is never a great idea to close down the zoos.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response addresses the prompt clearly, maintaining a consistent position throughout. The arguments regarding animal welfare and employment are relevant and supported by examples, such as the Vancouver zoo anecdote. However, the development of the employment argument is slightly repetitive, and the link between zoos and 'fantastic theory' is a bit vague. To reach a higher band, ensure that each supporting point is fully explored with more depth rather than just listing benefits. Overall, the response is well-structured and directly answers the question, meeting the requirements for a Band 7.0.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore', 'Additionally', and 'Consequently' are used effectively to guide the reader through the arguments. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate distinct ideas. While the flow is generally smooth, some transitions between sentences could be more sophisticated to avoid a slightly mechanical feel. The referencing is clear, and the progression of ideas is logical, which aligns well with the Band 7.0 descriptor.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is sufficient for the task, allowing for some flexibility and precision. You have used some topic-specific terms like 'wildlife', 'species', and 'nurturing'. However, there are some minor inaccuracies in word choice, such as referring to zoo animals as 'live stock', which is typically reserved for farm animals. Additionally, 'boon' is a good attempt at a less common word, but it is used slightly awkwardly in context. To improve, focus on more precise collocations and ensure that vocabulary is used in the most natural way possible.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several error-free sentences, which is positive. However, there are some recurring grammatical slips, such as 'They set free' (should be passive: 'They were set free') and 'todays youth' (missing apostrophe). The use of articles is occasionally inconsistent, such as 'the zoos' in some contexts where it is not required. While these errors do not impede communication, they prevent the essay from reaching a higher band. Increasing the variety of complex structures while maintaining accuracy will help improve this score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.