Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Human beings has a keen interest in watching and analysing animals. Often people says that animals should be moved to jungel from the current active zoos and that place must be closed. I am not agree with this statement and the reasons are discussing in this eassy.

Firstly, animal park is one of the exiting place to the people for visiting and observe the animals. This area enable the individual study the attitude and behaviour of the wild animals, this would help people to understand more about the animals. Moreover, zoos are not only for watching animals, it educates people about the particular specious. For an example, most of the zoos have displayed the scientific information regarding the animal which keep in the cage, that would be help the person to get more information regarding that specific animal.

Secondly, zoos are the important source of goverment income. People has to pay a certain amount of fees to enter into the zoo and which would help the authority to raise the money and spend it for improving infrastructure facilities. In addition, zoo also help the general public through employment opportunity. The official function and maitaining the facilities only done through the human, this opportunity leads to reduce the unemployment rate in the society.

Thirdly, zoos help the people to get more time with the family and friends. Most of the animal parks are designed for entertainment purpose, this infrastructure facility leads the person to engage more time with their relatives. Furthermore, this public facility brings more relaxation towards the person due to activities and services provided.

In conclusion, zoos are important place for the public for studing and observing the animals. If the animals moved to forest it is difficult to the individual to watchthe animals with theri family and friend in a safe method.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses the prompt by clearly stating a position against closing zoos and provides several arguments, such as education, government revenue, employment opportunities, and family leisure. The student outlines their stance in the introduction and follows through with supporting paragraphs. However, some ideas are somewhat simplistic and lack deeper extension or more sophisticated support. For instance, the discussion on government income and employment could be developed with more specific examples or broader socio-economic implications. Overall, all parts of the task are adequately addressed, earning a Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing, dividing the introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion effectively. Cohesive devices are employed to link ideas, such as "Firstly," "Secondly," "Furthermore," and "In conclusion." However, referencing and cohesion are at times mechanical or slightly faulty, as seen in phrases like "that place must be closed" and "the reasons are discussing in this eassy." Paragraph progression is logical, but the connection between sentences could be smoother to reach higher band levels. This performance fits the Band 6.0 descriptors well.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, allowing the student to convey their message about zoos, education, and employment. There are several attempts to use less common items and topic-specific vocabulary, such as "infrastructure facilities," "unemployment rate," and "entertainment purpose." However, there are noticeable spelling and word choice inaccuracies throughout the text, such as "jungel" instead of jungle, "exiting" instead of exciting, "specious" instead of species, "maitaining" instead of maintaining, and "studing" instead of studying. These lexical slips and spelling errors indicate a Band 5.5 performance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some variety in structure. However, there are frequent grammatical errors and awkward phrasing that persist throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues ("Human beings has", "People says", "animal which keep"), incorrect verb forms ("are discussing", "If the animals moved"), and preposition errors ("get more time with the family"). While these errors do not completely impede communication, their frequency prevents the essay from reaching a higher band. Therefore, a score of 5.0 is appropriate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.