Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is widely acknowledged that zoo is important even today , has become an increasingly contentious issue in comtemprary socity .While some proponentss assert justification no lognere to have animals kept in zoos,i firmly contend that my oppinion i disagree the zoo is important event today. This easy will critially examin the issue before reaching a balanced conclusion . To commence with , one compelling justification animals save from pray is the one reason. This is largely attributed to animals are save from pray atles they are save in zoo and there also have care from zoo , like doctors, food and look after from zoo.As a result , it is a reason to infer the result animals are dying .

Another pivotal consisderation is the second reason is zoo should never close becasue in the zoo is a history of animals .From a broader perspective , this may give rise in significant development in zoo.A pertinent examples is zoo has history of if want to see elephant no need to find in forest we can go in zoo and see the elephnat .if we visit zoo at same time see many types of animals and histoy also, which clearly potential underseccore impact in this trend .

To recapitulte , although differing viewpoints persist ,the perponents supports the view that my oppinion zoo is important never close even today . Zoo have memory of ou children they also get informaion about the animals in one place .Therefore, adopting the approach appear both pragmetic and beneficial in the long trem.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You take a position in favour of keeping zoos, which responds to the agree/disagree question, and you offer relevant points about animal care and public access to wildlife. However, the position is not consistently expressed: the opening says “I firmly contend” but then gives the unclear phrase “my oppinion i disagree,” and the conclusion refers confusingly to “the perponents.” The supporting ideas are limited and under-developed. For example, you mention doctors and food but do not explain how zoos protect species or provide evidence; the point about seeing elephants is also asserted rather than developed. To strengthen the response, state your position plainly and explain each reason with a specific example and a clear link to why zoos should remain open.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and phrases such as “To commence with,” “Another pivotal consideration” and “To recapitulate” signal the intended structure. This gives the reader some sense of organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is often difficult to follow because ideas are repeated or connected unclearly. For instance, “one compelling justification animals save from pray” is followed by several fragments about care and animals dying, without a clear explanation of their relationship. The second body paragraph shifts between zoo history, seeing elephants and children learning. Use one main idea per paragraph, then develop it in a logical sequence with clear references and fewer formulaic transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt a range of topic-related and academic expressions, including “contentious issue,” “pivotal consideration” and “pertinent examples,” and you use relevant words such as “animals,” “doctors” and “forest.” However, vocabulary is limited in effective control: frequent spelling errors and inaccurate word choices sometimes make the meaning difficult to understand. Examples include “pray” where the intended word appears to be “prey,” “history of animals” for the idea of learning about wildlife, and “memory of ou children.” Several phrases also sound unnatural, such as “look after from zoo.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully. Prefer clear wording over formal phrases that do not fit the meaning.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a concession in “although differing viewpoints persist” and a cause-and-effect link beginning “As a result.” However, sentence structures are often faulty, and errors frequently make relationships between ideas hard to interpret. For example, “While some proponentss assert justification no lognere to have animals kept in zoos” lacks a clear grammatical structure, while “This is largely attributed to animals are save” does not form a correct clause. There are also recurring problems with articles, agreement, verb forms and punctuation, as in “zoo is important” and “Zoo have memory.” Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check each sentence for a complete, clear structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.