Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

There is ongoing debate whether animals should be kept in zoos or not. Some people beleive that it is better to keep animals in the zoos under supervision of experts and it also provides cheaper entertainment to the public. However, I believe that animals are belonged to forest and their natural habitat is more conveneint and beneficial to them.

To begin with, Wildlife allows animal to live and breed freely. By keeping them in the zoos, we are breaking the natural cycle of foodchains. As a result, many species are at risk of extinction. Additionally, by keeping wild animals in the zoo, We are destroying their ability to prey and live in forests. Keeping animals in confined spaces can affect their physical and psychological well being. For instance, lions and elephants require large spaces to room freely while conventional zoos can not provide enough spaces for large animals.

On the other hands, some argue that keeping animals under expert supervision and safe environment has benefits for both animals and public. The zoos are considered cheaper source of entertainments, It allows children to observe animals closely and explore nature variations, Additionally, zoos can contribute to coservation, rescue and breeding of animals and can play the role to protect endangered species.

In conclusion, I beleive that animals should not be kept in the zoo. Governments should invest in protecting wildlife by conserving their natural habitats. For entertainment and informational tours, public should prefer alternative options such as safari. Although these options are costly but will allow wider exposure to the wildlife.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear: you oppose keeping animals in zoos, and you address the counterargument that zoos can provide entertainment and support conservation. The points about animals’ freedom, the needs of large species, and habitat protection are relevant. This meets the task well, but some ideas are asserted rather than fully explained. For example, the claim that zoos break food chains and put species at risk of extinction is not clearly connected or supported, and the conservation benefit is acknowledged without explaining why it is outweighed by your concerns. To strengthen the response, develop one or two key reasons with a specific example and explain more directly why alternatives such as safaris are preferable.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph supporting your view, a counterargument, and a conclusion. The progression from animals’ welfare to the benefits claimed for zoos is easy to follow, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “On the other hands,” and “In conclusion” help identify the stages of the argument. However, some linking is mechanical, and the third paragraph contains several ideas joined in a long sequence, making the relationships between them less clear. References such as “these options” in the conclusion could also be more precise. Use fewer formulaic transitions and organise each paragraph around a central point, with clearer links between the claim, explanation, and example.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “natural habitat,” “confined spaces,” “endangered species,” and “conserving their natural habitats.” These choices make your position and examples clear, and you attempt some less common terms related to wildlife and conservation. However, several spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, including “beleive,” “conveneint,” “room freely,” and “entertainments.” Some collocations are also unnatural, such as “explore nature variations” and “wider exposure to the wildlife.” Aim for accurate, natural combinations rather than more elaborate phrasing: for example, say that animals “roam freely,” that zoos offer “a cheaper form of entertainment,” and that children can “learn about biodiversity.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple and complex sentence forms, including a contrastive opening with “However” and a concession beginning “Although these options are costly.” Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make sentences awkward. For example, “animals are belonged to forest” has an incorrect verb construction and article use; “Wildlife allows animal to live” has a number-agreement problem; and “It allows children…” does not clearly agree with the plural subject “zoos.” Punctuation also needs attention in the sentence beginning “The zoos are considered…,” where several independent ideas are joined with commas. Practise accurate articles, agreement, and sentence boundaries while retaining your range of structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.