Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS General Essentials · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Many believe that we should no longer keep animals in zoos, and all the zoos must be closed. I strongly agree with statement because we all say that a "cage is always a cage, no matter even if it is made of gold". Animals being kept in the the cages for years and years is kind of a torture we could ever do to a living creature. What if we were treated the same way? There are plethora of reasons why people say this must be fully stopped.

Mainly, animals when put on cage often suffer from conditions like depression, anxiety, stress and so on. This happens because they are captured from forests, which are vast lands, and brought into a limited space. The enclosures made by these zoo authorities are extremely small compared to where they lived before, which makes it tedious for them to adapt with these man-made facilities. For example, one tiger need ten to hundered hectares of land. It does not live in groups other than when it is going to mate or has cubs accompanying. Therefore, it is called a territory oriented animal. It marks, hunt and protect its territory from any kind of encroachments. Where in the world do we have zoo cages that offer an proper eco-systems to these poor creatures. For that reason, it should all be sent out to their lives without any human interference.

However, there should be suitable ways to conserve these animals by making conservatories, national parks, open zoo and wildlife sancturies. Animals are important factor that controls the food cycle, so it is highly important to protect them from getting endangered. Human interactions should be limited, but it is inevitable as it is part of nations tourism.

In conclusion, animals are to be sent out to live a free life without any human interference. Therefore, I strongly stand with people who say that all zoo must be closed. However, we can still allow humans to see these animals in a limited manner by having conservatories and national parks, where we won't affect these animals peace.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the opening and conclusion: you agree that zoos should close, and you support this mainly with the effects of captivity on animals. The discussion of restricted space, stress and the tiger’s territorial behaviour gives the argument relevant detail. You also acknowledge conservation and public access, suggesting national parks and conservatories, so the response addresses more than one aspect of the issue. However, the conservation alternative is introduced briefly and its practical role is not fully explained; the claim that animals should live without human interference also sits uneasily beside allowing tourism and human viewing. Develop this qualification and explain how protected areas could replace zoos while still caring for animals that cannot be released.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a recognisable structure: an introduction states your view, the first body paragraph explains the harms of captivity, the next presents alternatives, and the conclusion restates your position. Linking expressions such as “Mainly,” “For example,” “However,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. The progression is generally logical, but some connections are abrupt or unclear. For instance, “For that reason, it should all be sent out” does not specify whether this means every animal or only those suitable for release, and the shift from opposing human interference to accepting tourism needs clearer explanation. Use more precise referencing and connect the conservation paragraph directly to the problem of closing zoos, rather than relying mainly on broad transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “enclosures,” “territory,” “endangered,” and “conservatories,” and these choices help communicate your ideas about animal welfare and conservation. There are also attempts at more expressive language, such as “a cage is always a cage” and “poor creatures.” However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, including “tedious for them to adapt,” “controls the food cycle,” and “part of nations tourism.” Spelling errors such as “hund ered” (written as “hundered”) and “sancturies” also reduce precision. Aim for natural, exact phrasing and check spelling; for example, describe animals as struggling to adapt to confined conditions and refer to their role in maintaining ecological balance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including a conditional question (“What if we were treated the same way?”), relative clauses, and cause-and-effect sentences. These give the response some variety, and the main argument remains understandable. However, some grammatical errors recur in articles, agreement, plurals and sentence construction. Examples include “all the zoos must be closed,” “one tiger need,” “an proper eco-systems,” and “all zoo must be closed.” The opening phrase “Animals being kept in the the cages for years and years is kind of a torture” is also awkwardly formed, with a repeated article and unclear sentence structure. Review subject–verb agreement and article use, and edit each sentence for a complete, natural grammatical pattern.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.