Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-09-10
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The table gives information about the average hours spent on the Internet by European people of different age groups.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
The shown table illustrates the number of hours spent online in Europe by people with different ages.
Overall, youngsters between 16 to 20 years use more Internet than all the other age groups, whereas people over 51 years old utilise it less than all the other categories.
It can be clearly seen that there are a few gender differences, as males from 11 to 25 years old are online approximately 1 or 2 hours more than the females. People with 26 to 30 years instead, report the same figure with 4 hours each. The gender trend shows variations for the ages from 31 to over 51 years old, as females tend to use the Intenet 1 hour more than the males.
The highest timing of online resources is given to young people from 16 to 20 years, with 19 hours for males and 18 hours for females. Elderly people account for the lowest hour numbers: 2 for males and 3 for females.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5
The response covers the main features of the data well. You successfully identified the peak usage age group (16-20) and the lowest usage group (over 51). You also made relevant comparisons between genders across different age brackets. However, the report could be improved by including more specific data points to support your observations, particularly regarding the middle age groups. While you mention the 26-30 age group, the description of the trends for other groups is slightly generalized. Including a few more precise figures would help to fully satisfy the requirement to report the main features.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0
The essay is logically organized with a clear introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs that group information by age and gender trends. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate different aspects of the data. Cohesive devices such as 'whereas', 'it can be clearly seen that', and 'instead' are used effectively to link ideas. However, the transition between the second and third body paragraph is slightly abrupt. To reach a higher band, ensure that the progression of ideas flows more smoothly between sentences and paragraphs, perhaps by using more varied linking phrases.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
You have an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'illustrates', 'utilises', 'variations', and 'account for'. There are some minor inaccuracies in word choice, such as 'highest timing of online resources', which is not a natural collocation; 'highest level of internet usage' would be more precise. Additionally, 'number of hours' is used correctly, but the phrasing could be more varied. The vocabulary is sufficient to convey your meaning clearly, but incorporating more precise academic collocations would enhance the quality of your writing.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are some grammatical errors, such as 'people with 26 to 30 years' (should be 'people aged 26 to 30') and 'the Intenet' (spelling error). While these errors do not impede communication, they are noticeable. You have attempted some complex structures, but the control over them is inconsistent. To improve, focus on ensuring subject-verb agreement and correct preposition usage, and aim for more error-free sentences to demonstrate better control over your grammatical range.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
