Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table gives information about the average hours spent on the Internet by European people of different age groups.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Average hours spent on the Internet by European people of different age groups

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table chart illustrates the proportion of the average hours spent on the internet by European individuals of different age groups.

Overall, it is evident that younger people age group spent more time on the internet, while children bracket had the second biggest users of the technology. Additionally, adult age group was the average hours spent on the internet. Middle age and elder age groups had the lowest spending hours.

To begin with, the younger individuals 16-20 age group recorded the highest spending hours on the internet, which was 19 hours male and 18 hours female. The children age bracket 11-15 the second largest users of the internet 8 hours male and 6 hours female. people who aged 21-25, they were using internet around 7 hours male and 5 hours female.

Turning to the next details, the adult age group 26-30 was 4 hours male and 4 hours female. The middle age 31-50 and older people group over 51 had the smallest screen time hours on the internet 3,2 male and 4,3 female

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The student attempts to cover the main features of the table, noting that the 16-20 age group spent the most time on the internet and highlighting differences between males and females. However, the overview paragraph contains vague and confusing phrasing, such as 'children bracket had the second biggest users' and 'adult age group was the average hours spent on the internet', which fails to clearly summarize the overarching trends. Furthermore, some data points are misreported or awkwardly expressed, such as the confusion regarding the figures for older groups. While the response addresses the prompt, the lack of precision in the overview and data reporting limits the score to Band 5.5.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response is structured into four paragraphs, following a logical layout with an introduction, an overview, and two body paragraphs detailing specific age brackets. Cohesive devices are attempted, such as 'To begin with', 'Additionally', and 'Turning to the next details'. However, referencing and transitions are often mechanical and awkward, particularly in the overview where the logical connection between sentences is weak. Paragraphing is present and visually separates the content, but the internal cohesion within sentences suffers from grammatical friction. Overall, the organization is coherent enough to follow, supporting a Band 6.0 score.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, successfully incorporating terms like 'proportion', 'age groups', and 'screen time'. However, there are notable lexical inaccuracies and awkward collocations, such as 'spending hours' instead of 'hours spent', and referring to age brackets as 'the younger individuals 16-20 age group' or 'middle age 31-50'. Less common vocabulary is attempted with limited success, and some phrasing sounds unnatural or repetitive. Spelling is generally accurate, but word choice errors occur frequently enough to prevent the score from reaching Band 6.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The student demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting relative clauses and comparative structures. However, grammatical accuracy is weak throughout the text, featuring frequent missing verbs, prepositions, and awkward syntax, such as 'people who aged 21-25, they were using internet' and 'smallest screen time hours on the internet 3,2 male and 4,3 female'. Punctuation and comma splices also detract from the quality of writing. While meaning is generally retrievable despite the errors, the high frequency of grammatical slips places this response firmly at Band 5.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.