Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-08
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
Many people think that acceptance of critical circumstances are best,such as an unsatisfactory employment or lack of money on the other hand some people believe that itis better to improve such conditions.Both views have their own merits but in my prespective it is better to try and improve such situation because it helps us in future and it will be helpful for our generation.
Generally,some people believe that it is best to embrace a bad situation,such as an unsatisfactory job and shortage of money because these type of people are live in comfort zone and donot try to improve your life style.By this mentality people are very satisfy with their life but they will not able to do something for their future and their next generation.the people whose believe that accept the bad situation they are very lazy and demrited.For example, the person who spend their whole life only in eating and enjoy but donot try for money dependence for their childrens he is very stupid and comfortable person.
On the other hand, other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.I strongly agree this point of view because it helps us in future and it will be helpful for our next generations.People who try to improve their life and get rid these situations from their life after some time they will able to do this.By this technique they will also save money for their generations and also stand their businesses for next to next offsprings.In my opinion this type of people will successful in their life who try to improve their situations.For example,Bill Gates is the most famous business personality of the world.He didnot accept bad situations in his life while he tried to improve his life and eliminate these bad situations from his life.
In conclusion,Many people believe that acceptance of critical circumstances are best,such as an unsatisfactory employment or lack of money on the other hand some people believe that itis better to improve such conditions.Both views have their own merits but in my prespective it is better to try and improve such situation because it helps us in future and it will be helpful for our generation
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You discuss both views and state a clear preference for trying to improve difficult circumstances, especially in the introduction and the paragraph beginning “On the other hand.” However, the discussion is only partly developed: the reasons for accepting a bad situation are presented mainly as laziness or comfort, rather than considering why acceptance might sometimes be sensible, such as when change is outside someone’s control. Your supporting examples are also weakly connected to the argument. The Bill Gates example is asserted rather than explained, and the first example relies on judgement rather than showing a realistic consequence. The conclusion repeats the introduction instead of drawing together the discussion. Develop both sides more fairly and explain how each example supports your point. (43 words copied from the task prompt were not counted.)
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. This helps the reader identify the main position. However, progression within paragraphs is often unclear, and linking is repetitive or awkward. For example, “On the other hand” signals a contrast, but the first view is not explored in a balanced way; “By this mentality” and “By this technique” do not clearly connect the following claims to the preceding ideas. The conclusion largely repeats the opening rather than advancing the discussion. Use clearer topic sentences, connect each reason directly to its explanation or example, and vary linking expressions. Check paragraph-internal references so readers can follow who or what each sentence refers to.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “critical circumstances,” “shortage of money,” “comfort zone,” and “next generations,” and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the argument difficult to interpret. Examples include “unsatisfactory employment,” “money dependence,” “stand their businesses,” and “demrited.” Repeated use of “bad situation,” “improve,” and “life” also makes the response less precise. Aim for natural topic-specific phrases such as “financial hardship,” “job dissatisfaction,” and “improve one’s circumstances,” and check spelling and word forms. More accurate collocations would make your ideas clearer without requiring more complicated vocabulary.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including clauses with “because” and “who,” but complex structures are often faulty, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences hard to follow. For example, “acceptance of critical circumstances are best” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “these type of people are live” combines incompatible verb forms. Other examples include “they will able to do this” and “the person who spend their whole life,” which show problems with verb forms and agreement. Sentence boundaries and punctuation are also inconsistent, with missing spaces after commas and full stops. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a clearly controlled subordinate clause, then proofread agreement, articles, and punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.