Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There is an ongoing debate regarding accepting a bad situation.A group of individuals believe that we should adopt a unsatisafing job or financial unstability, however others claim that we should try our best to overcome these problems, Therefore a head of my opinion both the views will be discussed further.

Accepting an unfavourable issues is not an appericiatable thing because it can lead to stress and mental breakdown. Living in a stressed environment can have adverse impact on physical as well as mental health of an individual. For instance a person who is doing a driving job but intreasted in information technology , it would be stressfull as well as frustrating for him.He will be less active and shows less interest in his job and lead to sever chronic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes etc.

On contrary side, it is better to fight against these problems if a person is willing to to drag himself off from worse issues he sould be motivated and try his best. For example, if a person is facing shortage of money, he should work hard and be confident to do anything to earn money in through a right way. Being determinent and consistence helps to achieve goals and to become successful in life.

By setting a goal a person can overcome such situations.

To conclude, i firmly believe that living in stressed environment can effect overall health of a person, therefore a person should try his best to improve his living standard rather then accepting the uncomfortable situation.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both views and state a clear preference for trying to improve difficult circumstances, especially in the conclusion. The examples about an unsuitable driving job and financial hardship are relevant, and the health consequences provide a reason for rejecting passive acceptance. However, the discussion is only partly developed: the first view is mainly presented as harmful, rather than explaining why someone might accept a bad situation, such as limited alternatives or the need for stability. The second view also relies on general advice to work hard, without showing how this could realistically improve the situation. Develop both sides more evenly and explain the examples in greater detail.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that restates your position. This gives the reader a basic route through the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and some linking expressions do not accurately show the relationship between ideas. For example, “On contrary side” is an awkward transition, while “therefore” in the introduction joins ideas without a clear grammatical structure. The first paragraph also moves quickly from job dissatisfaction to illness without fully explaining the connection. Use simpler, accurate transitions and build each paragraph through a clear point, explanation, and example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt vocabulary relevant to the topic, including “unfavourable,” “adverse impact,” “overcome,” and “determinant,” which shows an effort to express more than basic ideas. However, spelling and word-choice errors are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less clear: “unsatisafing,” “financial unstability,” “appericiatable,” and “consistence” are examples. Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “drag himself off from worse issues” and “earn money in through a right way.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations rather than choosing ambitious words whose form or meaning is uncertain. Proofreading spelling and checking phrases in context would make your vocabulary more effective.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including a conditional example beginning “if a person is facing shortage of money.” However, the range is limited, and complex sentences are often not controlled accurately. Errors include missing or incorrect articles (“a unsatisafing job”), subject–verb agreement (“he … shows less interest”), and faulty sentence construction in the introduction (“therefore a head of my opinion…”). Punctuation also causes problems, particularly missing spaces after full stops and the comma splice in the opening sentence. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a clearly connected supporting clause, then check articles, agreement, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.