Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-11
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Some individuals argue that it is good to accept the worse situation, such as unsatisfied job or finanical issue. While other believe that try to improve tsuch situations are better approach. In this essay I will discuss both views before presenting own opinion.
First and foremost, many people argue that accepting challening situation is better for individuals. It helps to cope with these issues and your brain and body starting adjust according to that situation. This approach has beneficial effects on the mental health. For instnace, a person who has accept the difficult situation and try handle these situation help to control their mental and depression level, if he cursing the situation and always thinks pessimistic has detrimental effects on the health.
On the other hand, there many individuals who think differently and believe that a person who facing these challenges should try to improve these situations. This approach is very beneficial for their future and it make him to become fighter and their efforts improve their financial condition. It is a good way to improve mental health. For example, a person who is strugling in unsatisfactory job and if he continue this job, it will cause serious mental health and might be lose enjoy happy moments. Moreover, this can create family disputes due to his unsatisfactory behaviour.
In conclusion, although accepting situation help to live peacfully, try to improve these bad situation has much beneficial aspects. In my opinion, improving these challening situations are much more beneifical for the individuals. It will improve their living standard and help to reduce depression.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and give a clear opinion: the introduction promises to discuss each side, and the conclusion favours trying to improve difficult circumstances. The points about accepting hardship helping people cope, and about an unsatisfactory job affecting mental health and family life, are relevant to the question. However, the two positions are not developed equally or fully. The benefits of acceptance are explained mainly in terms of adapting and protecting mental health, while the case for improvement would be stronger with a specific explanation of how someone could change their circumstances and what outcomes might follow. Some claims, such as that acceptance helps control depression, also need clearer qualification or support. Develop each main idea with a reason and a concrete example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion that states your preference. Signposting such as “First and foremost,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” makes the direction of the discussion easy to follow. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and shows some movement towards more flexible cohesion. However, the linking is somewhat formulaic, and connections within sentences are not always clear—for example, the long sentence beginning “For instance, a person who has accept…” combines several points without a clear structure. Use shorter, more controlled sentences and connect each example explicitly to the claim it supports. Clearer referencing would also help readers follow who is affected.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “mental health,” “financial condition,” “family disputes,” and “living standard,” so the main subject is generally understandable. There are also attempts at more specific expressions such as “detrimental effects.” However, the usable range is limited, and noticeable spelling, word-form, and collocation errors sometimes make the reader pause: examples include “finanical,” “challening,” “strugling,” and “unsatisfied job.” Several phrases are also imprecise or unnatural, such as “control their mental and depression level” and “become fighter.” Build a bank of accurate collocations for employment, financial hardship, and coping, and check spelling and word forms carefully. More precise vocabulary would make your arguments clearer and less repetitive.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrastive opening with “While” and conditional structures such as “if he continue this job.” However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence construction can make meaning difficult to follow. For example, “many people argue that accepting challening situation is better” lacks a plural article pattern, while “a person who has accept” and “it make him” show problems with verb forms and agreement. The sentence beginning “For instance, a person who has accept…” is also difficult to parse because several clauses are joined without clear control. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and past participles, and use shorter sentences when expressing several linked ideas.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.