Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-07-27

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

It is undeniable that life is a series of ups and downs and how we respond to challenging circumstances often defines our journey. In this regard, some argue that it is best to accept unfavorable situations, such as unsatisfactory job or financial hardship, viewing them as inevitable parts of life. While, others maintain that proactive efforts to improve such conditions are crucial. This essay will discuss not only both perspectives but also my opinion which is in favor of

the former point of view in the forthcoming paragraphs with a relevant conclusion.

On the one hand, people who believe that accepting a difficult situation is best give their reasons as follows. Firstly, adapting to a bad situation fosters emotional intelligence by providing resilience and satisfaction. To explain, constantly fighting circumstances beyond immediate control can lead to chronic stress, anxiety, and burnout. For instance, an individual facing a sudden nationwide economic challenges may find it more practical to budget strictly and accept temporary financial limitations rather than risking scarce capital on volatile progress. Consequently, by practicing tolerance, individuals protect their mental well-being and maintain stability, preventing rapid decisions that could potentially worsen their situation. Secondly, Accepting a bad situation can bring peace of mind, lower stress. To elaborate, sometimes it is good for an individual for letting go of the fight as it stops daily worry. Therefore, people feel calm inside when they stop You stop wasting energy on things you cannot change right now. Moreover, keeping a bad job gives you money for food and rent instead of risking total job loss. To clarify, staying safe prevents risky choices that might make money problems worse.

On the other hand, a stronger case can be made for actively working to change negative circumstances. The prime one is that humanity progresses through dissatisfaction, and self-approval often traps individuals in cycles which cannot be fulfill in one go. To exemplify, working in a stationary, unsatisfactory job offers zero career progression and diminishes self-worth over time. By dynamically seeking new qualifications, networking, or relocating, people unlock superior career paths and higher income sources. To illustrate, an individual stuck in an unfulfilling job might seek additional qualifications or skills to enhance their career prospects. Similarly, a shortage of money can be reduced by developing high-value skills or starting a side business. Taking control of one's destiny ultimately breaks the cycle of poverty and dissatisfaction. As a result, this significant approach can improve the quality of life of a person and diminish the stress.

In conclusion, although there are several factors in favor of trying and improving the situations such as seeking new job prospects yet, in my view, accepting a challenging situation is best way as it fosters the emotional intelligence.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.0

The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are generally well-developed, particularly in the second body paragraph. However, there is a significant contradiction: the introduction states the author favors the 'former' view (accepting the situation), but the conclusion reiterates this, while the body paragraphs spend more time arguing for the 'latter' (improving the situation). This creates a slight confusion regarding the consistency of the position. Despite this, the main arguments are relevant and supported with examples, meeting the requirements for a Band 6.5/7.0 performance.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized with clear paragraphing. Cohesive devices are used throughout, such as 'On the one hand,' 'To explain,' and 'In conclusion.' However, some transitions are mechanical or slightly awkward, such as 'The prime one is that...' and the abrupt shift in the second paragraph ('You stop wasting energy...'). Referencing is generally clear, but the flow between sentences occasionally feels repetitive. The progression of ideas is evident, but the internal structure of the paragraphs could be more fluid to reach a higher band.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The vocabulary is adequate for the task, with some attempts at more sophisticated language like 'inevitable parts of life,' 'chronic stress,' and 'career progression.' There are some minor errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'which cannot be fulfill' (should be 'fulfilled') and 'this significant approach' (which is slightly unnatural in this context). While the range is sufficient to convey meaning clearly, it lacks the flexibility and precision required for a higher band score. The repetition of basic phrases like 'bad situation' also limits the lexical variety.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'While, others maintain...' (incorrect comma usage), 'an individual facing a sudden nationwide economic challenges' (article/pluralization error), and 'accepting a challenging situation is best way' (missing article). While these errors are frequent, they rarely impede communication. The writer demonstrates an ability to construct complex sentences, but the control over these structures is inconsistent, placing the response firmly in the Band 6 range.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.