Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-02
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Nowadays, some people believe that accept any condition to earn money however, other individuals think that better job is good rather than selecting unsatisfactory situation in job. I believe, better environment in job is satisfying for life and risk involves in bad situation.
To commence with, job satisfactions is main role in earn money as individual's work at safe condition than they give theirs best to the company as affords by peoples are good than company growth directly company growth involved peoples growth. For Example, in retail sector their is more opportunities for people like avenue Supermart limited the as increasing in business their is more opportunities for recruitments.
In opposite, in bad situation people accept wrong way to fulfills theirs requirements such as crime.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 250 words, reaching only 125 words. Consequently, the development of ideas is severely limited. While the essay attempts to address both sides of the argument, the points are underdeveloped and lack sufficient supporting evidence or logical expansion. The position is stated in the introduction, but the lack of depth prevents a full discussion of the topic. To improve, you must expand each body paragraph with detailed explanations and concrete examples to meet the length requirement and provide a more comprehensive analysis of the prompt.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is divided into paragraphs, which is a positive step. However, the logical progression of ideas is hindered by the brevity of the text. Cohesive devices are used in a very mechanical and sometimes inaccurate way, such as 'To commence with' and 'In opposite'. The referencing is often unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the flow of the argument. To improve, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that each sentence logically follows the previous one to create a more cohesive and coherent argument.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The range of vocabulary is limited and repetitive. There are frequent errors in word choice and collocation, such as 'job satisfactions is main role in earn money' and 'affords by peoples'. These errors occasionally impede communication, making the meaning unclear. To reach a higher band, you should work on using more precise vocabulary related to the topic of employment and personal development, and focus on correct word forms and collocations. Expanding your vocabulary through reading academic texts will help you use words more naturally and accurately.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The grammatical range is very limited, consisting mostly of simple sentences with frequent errors in basic grammar, including subject-verb agreement ('job satisfactions is'), article usage, and sentence structure. Many sentences are fragmented or lack proper grammatical construction, which makes the text difficult to read. There is little evidence of complex sentence structures. To improve, focus on mastering basic sentence construction, including correct verb tenses and subject-verb agreement. Once you have a solid foundation, practice incorporating complex sentences using relative clauses and subordinating conjunctions to improve your grammatical range.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.