Band 8.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 8.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-08-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 8.0)

**Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.**

People respond to adverse circumstances in different ways. While some argue that accepting an unsatisfactory situation is the most sensible approach, particularly when circumstances are beyond an individual's control, others believe that people should actively seek ways to improve their lives. In my view, although acceptance can be appropriate in certain circumstances, making a determined and realistic effort to bring about positive change is generally more beneficial.

On the one hand, accepting an unfavourable situation can sometimes be the most rational course of action. Not every problem can be solved through individual effort, and attempting to change circumstances that are largely beyond one's control may result in unnecessary frustration and disappointment. For instance, during an economic recession, a person may have to remain in an undesirable job because alternative employment is scarce. In such a situation, accepting the reality of the circumstances can enable the individual to maintain financial stability while waiting for better opportunities. Furthermore, learning to accept certain limitations can protect people's mental well-being, as constantly comparing their lives with an idealized version of success may create considerable stress.

On the other hand, passive acceptance can prevent individuals from reaching their full potential. Many difficult circumstances can be improved if people are willing to take calculated risks and invest time and effort in developing themselves. An employee who is dissatisfied with their career, for example, could acquire new qualifications, develop professionally valuable skills, or apply for positions in other organisations. Similarly, someone struggling financially could seek additional employment, establish a small business, or acquire skills that offer better earning opportunities. Such actions may not produce immediate results, but they can gradually transform an individual's circumstances and provide greater financial and personal independence.

I believe the most effective approach is to distinguish between situations that can be changed and those that cannot. People should accept temporary setbacks when there is little they can do about them, but they should not use acceptance as an excuse for inaction. Instead, they should concentrate their energy on factors within their control and pursue realistic solutions. This balanced approach allows people to remain resilient without becoming complacent.

**In conclusion, accepting difficult circumstances can be sensible when they are genuinely beyond an individual's control. However, where improvement is realistically possible, taking proactive steps is a more constructive approach because it can create better opportunities and lead to long-term personal development.**

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 8.0

The response fully addresses all parts of the prompt. You have clearly discussed both perspectives—the value of acceptance in uncontrollable situations and the benefits of proactive improvement—while maintaining a consistent and well-supported personal opinion throughout. The ideas are well-developed with relevant examples, such as the economic recession scenario and the career development strategies. The position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion, and the balanced approach demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic. There are no omissions, and the argument is logically structured to meet the requirements of the task.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 8.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between the two viewpoints is smooth, facilitated by effective cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', and 'Furthermore'. The use of referencing is precise, and the paragraphing is logical and appropriate. The flow of the argument is natural, and the relationship between sentences is clearly established, making the text very easy to follow. There is no evidence of mechanical or repetitive use of linking words.

Lexical Resource — Band 8.0

You demonstrate a wide and flexible range of vocabulary, which is used with precision and natural control. Phrases such as 'adverse circumstances', 'idealized version of success', 'calculated risks', and 'remain resilient without becoming complacent' show a high level of lexical sophistication. The word choices are consistently appropriate for an academic context, and there are no noticeable errors in collocation or spelling. The vocabulary effectively conveys nuanced meanings, contributing to the overall clarity and impact of the argument.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 8.0

The essay displays a wide range of grammatical structures, including complex sentences, conditional clauses, and varied sentence beginnings. The majority of sentences are error-free, and the control over punctuation and syntax is excellent. You use modal verbs and subordinate clauses effectively to express nuanced ideas. There are no significant grammatical errors that impede communication, and the overall control of language is highly accurate, reflecting a strong command of English grammar suitable for a high-band score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.