Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-09-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
People have different views regarding the challanges of life. Some proponents argue that it is wiser decision to accept a bad situation such as unsatisfied job or financial crisis, while others claim that the better way is to try to improve these situations by working hard. I am completely in favour of second statement. From my stand point noting is impossible if a persons tries to make his situations better he will definitely get positive results. This essay will discus both views, before explaining my opinion.
On the one hand, it is widely considerd that to accept abd situations will be better strategy. It helps stay away from challenges of life, individuals will not have to do extra struggles their life will be smooth as hapening. I strongly believe that this act will creates numerous disadvantages. Firstly, the person will exhausts from his life. For instance, when a person is working in a hospital where he is asgined to prescribe multiple tests to patients so that the hospital can earn more money. If a person will accept these terms and start working like that he will definitely become frustrated by seeing unfordable persons struggling financially to pay hospital bills. Secondly when a person comes from poorer faamily and he accepts that he has to live this life. He will tired from his life. As he haver yto face financial issues in his daily rotune. Consequently, he can try be attempt sucide.
On the other hand, it is argued that it is better to endeavor to improve the situations. It will bring numerous benefits. Firstly, it will encourage the person to work hards.As it is sayinh that hardwork pays off. When person works hard and graduate with higher grades he get good job with good salary. As a result, he will be able to support his family financially. Socially, it helps boost the selfestem. When a person will refuse to do illegal task at workplace and join the job where he can work with staisfication. He will become socially active and will spend a peacefull and happy life.
In conclusion, although to accept bad situations prevents a person from stuggles of life, try to improve situations makes individuals bold, active and gives them a sense of fulfillment.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The student addresses all parts of the task by discussing both views—accepting a bad situation versus trying to improve it—and clearly states an opinion in favour of the latter. Ideas are presented and supported, such as discussing the psychological toll of accepting a bad job or how hard work leads to better career prospects. However, some arguments, particularly around extreme consequences like suicide in the first body paragraph, are somewhat over-generalized and lack fully realized support, placing the response solidly at Band 6. The position is clear throughout, and the main arguments are relevant to the prompt, fulfilling all core requirements for this band level.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a clear overall structure with an introduction, body paragraphs addressing both views, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate ideas. Cohesive devices are used to signal progression, such as 'On the one hand', 'On the other hand', 'Firstly', and 'In conclusion'. However, referencing and transitions are sometimes mechanical or faulty, as seen in phrases like 'hapening' instead of 'happening' or abrupt shifts between sentences. Paragraph boundaries are functional, but overall cohesion occasionally feels disjointed, aligning with the characteristics of a Band 6 score.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The student attempts a range of vocabulary appropriate for an academic discussion, including terms like 'financial crisis', 'proponents', 'endeavour', and 'fulfillment'. However, there are frequent spelling errors ('challanges', 'unsatisfied', 'noting', 'considerd', 'abd', 'hapening', 'asgined', 'unfordable', 'faamily', 'rotune', 'hards', 'sayinh', 'selfestem', 'staisfication', 'stuggles') and occasional word choice inaccuracies ('accept abd situations', 'doing extra struggles'). These errors occasionally create strain for the reader, but communication is not impeded, making Band 5.0 or 5.5 appropriate. The strong attempts at less common vocabulary push it to a 5.5.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing conditional structures and relative clauses (e.g., 'If a person will accept these terms...'). However, grammatical control is inconsistent, with frequent errors in verb tense, subject-verb agreement, and articles, such as 'if a persons tries', 'this act will creates', 'he will tired', and 'try to improve situations'. Punctuation is also occasionally problematic, with fragments and run-on sentences. Because these errors occur frequently and sometimes cause difficulty for the reader, the grammar profile fits the Band 5 descriptors.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.