Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-02
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
THROUGHOUT THE JOURNEY OF OUR LIVES THERE ARE MANY UPS AND DOWNS THAT WE HAVE TO FACE . SOME ARGUE THAT ITS FAVOURABLE TO ACCEPT OUR FAILURES AND ON OTHER HAND SOME BELIEVES THAT WE SHOULD LEARN FROM OUR FAILURES TO ACHIEVE MORE IN OUR LIVES.BOTH VIEWS AR DISCUSSED BELOW ALONG WITH MY OPINION.
TO COMMENCE WITH , IT IS RIGHTLY SAID LIFE IS NOT ALWAYS BEAUTIFULL, IT COMES WITH HARDSHIPS , FOR INSTANCE SOME PEOPLE ARE WORKING BUT THEY ARE NOT INTERNALLY SATISFIED WITH THERE JOBS BUT THEY DO IT JUST TO FULLFILL THERE NEEDS SOMETIMES WE NEED TO ACCEPT NEEDS AND SATISFACTIONS DOES NOT COME HAND IN HAND.
ON OTHER HAND SOME ARGUE TO TRY BETTER UNTIL YOU GET WHAT YOU WANT OR DESERVE EVERY PERSON HAD FAILURE ONCE IN THERE LIFE FOR INSTANCT A GREAT SCIENTIST WHO WON NOBLE PRIZE ELBERT EINSTIEN FAILED SEVERAL TIMES DURING HIS INVENTIONS. HURDLES WILL ALWAYS BE THERE IN ONE LIFE BUT WE SHOULD PREPARE AOR OURSELVES TO CONQER ANY OBSTACLES THAT COMES IN OUR SITUATIONS .
IN THE NUTSHELL , VERY FAILURE TEACHES US LESSON THERFORE IN MY OPINION ITS REALLY IMPORTANT THAT WE OVERCOME OUR FAILURES TO BE SUCCESSFULL IN LIFE AND TO CHANGE YOUR SITUATION IS ALWAYS IS IN YOUR HAND .LIFE IS LIKE A COIN HAVING TWO SIDES ITS YOUR WILLPOWER TO IMPROVE YOUR SITUATION
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
The response addresses the task only partially. It touches upon both views regarding accepting a bad situation versus trying to improve it, and the writer provides a concluding personal opinion. However, the ideas remain limited and under-developed. For instance, the argument about accepting a job just to fulfil basic needs is stated rather than expanded with clear reasoning or extended examples. Furthermore, the length requirement is not met, as the response falls short of the minimum 250-word count, which restricts the depth of the discussion. To reach a higher band, the writer must ensure the word count requirement is fulfilled and expand each perspective with fully developed explanations and relevant examples.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
There is some organisation, but a clear overall progression is lacking across the essay. The response is divided into paragraphs, and the introduction outlines the structure of the essay. However, the use of cohesive devices is frequently mechanical or inaccurate, such as the abrupt transitions using 'TO COMMENCE WITH' and 'ON OTHER HAND' without adequate integration. Paragraphing is also inconsistent, with all capitalisation and punctuation choices failing to establish a smooth flow of ideas. Referencing is sometimes unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the logical development of arguments. To improve, the writer needs to employ a wider range of cohesive devices more naturally and ensure that each paragraph builds logically upon the previous one.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate for the task. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'FAVOURABLE' and 'CONQER', but noticeable errors in spelling, word form, and word choice occur throughout the text. Examples include spelling mistakes like 'BEAUTIFULL', 'FULLFILL', 'INSTANCT', 'ELBERT EINSTIEN', 'THERFORE', and 'SUCCESSFULL'. Additionally, lexical collocations are occasionally awkward, such as 'TRY BETTER' instead of 'try harder'. These errors cause some difficulty for the reader and impede the precision of the argument. To achieve a higher band, the writer must expand their lexical range and pay closer attention to spelling and accurate word formation.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The response displays a very limited range of structures, relying mostly on simple sentences alongside a few faulty attempts at complex ones. Frequent grammatical errors can cause difficulty for the reader, including missing articles ('IS NOT ALWAYS BEAUTIFULL'), pronoun and subject-verb agreement issues ('NEEDS AND SATISFACTIONS DOES NOT COME'), and incorrect prepositions or punctuation patterns. Run-on sentences and comma splices are also present, such as in the final paragraph where multiple clauses are joined improperly without correct punctuation. To improve, the writer needs to demonstrate a greater variety of complex grammatical structures and exercise much better control over basic sentence construction, punctuation, and tense consistency.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.