Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

A few individuals consider that it is excellent to accept a predicament, such as unfulfilling job or financial hardship. Other argue that is good to try and enhance such situation. the job and also the salary of any individual is significant in their daily life because this amount fulfils their needs.

Initially, in the current situation to manage the whole family needs that are too much difficult. in some countries the inflation rate is increasing day by day and the unemployment rate is also rising steadily. It mostly affects the salary class. Financial sport is very important in our daily life for any men or women. For Instance, in the country a person who work full time in a company for almost 5 years and the organization doesn't increase his pay according to economy of a country, so it creates the bad impact on the employe life because he cannot fulfil their family necessity.

In contrast, we believe that if we should try to improve bad situation. If we accept the low-income job or bad job forever, then we will never grow. Additionally, a person can learn new skill and he applying to get better salary job. These creates a better future because he takes control of his life. In my country many people work hard and trying to do new courses which help them in their jobs.

According to my opinion, it is crucial for any person to have an excellent job which pay them to improve their lifestyle and also, they live happy.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

The response addresses the prompt by discussing both views on whether to accept or improve difficult life situations and provides a personal opinion. However, the ideas are presented in a somewhat limited and under-developed manner. For instance, the discussion on inflation and unemployment touches upon why people might struggle, but it lacks specific extension or thorough exploration. Similarly, the argument for improving one's situation mentions learning new skills, yet this point is not fully expanded with clear examples or detailed reasoning. The writer's position is discernible by the end of the essay, but the overall development remains basic, restricting the response from achieving a higher level of elaboration.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some overall organization with clear paragraph breaks separating the introduction, body paragraphs addressing both views, and the conclusion. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression between the ideas, and some transitions feel abrupt or mechanical. For example, the sentence starting with 'Initially' does not logically introduce the first main point smoothly, and the use of cohesive devices is somewhat repetitive and inaccurate in places. Pronoun referencing is also occasionally unclear, such as 'these creates a better future' where the referent for 'these' is ambiguous. Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal logical flow requires better transitional links to guide the reader seamlessly through the arguments.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate to convey the basic message of the prompt. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary items, such as 'predicament', 'financial hardship', and 'unemployment rate', but these are accompanied by noticeable errors in word choice, collocation, and word form. For instance, phrases like 'unfulfilling job or financial hardship' (missing an article), 'salary class', and 'bad impact on the employe life' demonstrate inaccurate lexical collocation. Additionally, there are persistent word-form errors, such as using 'Other' instead of 'Others' and 'applying' instead of 'apply', which occasionally cause some difficulty for the reader and reflect a restricted lexical range.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay employs a limited range of sentence structures, relying primarily on simple sentences alongside attempts at complex forms that are frequently faulty. There are frequent grammatical errors throughout the text, including issues with subject-verb agreement ('the job and also the salary... is', 'person who work'), missing articles, and incorrect verb tenses ('trying to do new courses which help'). For example, the construction 'we believe that if we should try to improve bad situation' contains an unnecessary modal verb and a missing article. These frequent errors in grammar, articles, and singular/plural forms cause noticeable difficulty for the reader, though the core meaning of the arguments usually remains retrievable.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.