Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is matter of debate some individual believe that accept the worse situation and don't try to find it's solution,situation for instance not appropriate job or crisis of money. While,some believe do not accept the bad situation but try to improve and eradicate the bad situations.
To commence with,there are numerous solid reason to survive in such situations.Firstly,if job is a permanent and also you don't have any second option then it is better to accept the job.Moreover,some individuals are not enough educated and skilled so they have to compromise with their job.In addition,some people do not have enough sources to improve their financial condition so,they manage to survive in shortage of money.
Turning to other point of argument,some individual believe instead of remaining calm or silent try to improve these worse situation,Firstly,these people improve the situation by hard work and learning a new skills for instance if anyone have great interest in business instead of working under other's supervision try to build the own business. Apart from that,if person not satisfied with his job try to find it's alternative and beneficial job instead of working with unsatisfaction. Moreover,i reckon everyone have their own mind and life and also everyone want freedom in their life so, they would chose that particular field and job in which they satisfied.Moreover,in the time of financial crisis instead of remaining calm try to improve the financial condition and find different sources of income.
Overall, i would like to sum up my discussion by saying accept the bad situation if we don't have family support or not enough education.While i consider,instead of accepting the situation try to enhance it.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You discuss both views and give a personal position: the first body paragraph explains why people may accept difficult circumstances, while the next presents ways to improve them. Your examples about limited education, job alternatives and starting a business are relevant. However, the discussion is only partly developed. For instance, the claim that people may accept a permanent job because they have no second option is not explored, and the business example is introduced without explaining what makes this a realistic route to improvement. Your opinion is also not fully clear: the conclusion first supports acceptance in some cases, then favours trying to improve the situation, without explaining how you weigh these views. Develop the reasons and state a consistent position more explicitly.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Sequencing phrases such as “To commence with” and “Turning to other point of argument” help signal the change in focus, and the reader can generally follow the discussion. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes mechanical, with repeated “Moreover” and “Firstly,” and several ideas are added without clear links explaining how they relate. The final paragraph also combines two positions rather than resolving the discussion clearly. Use fewer formulaic transitions, group related reasons together, and make each paragraph develop one central point. Clearer references between sentences would also help the argument flow more naturally.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some relevant vocabulary for the topic, including “financial condition,” “shortage of money,” “alternative” and “sources of income.” These choices make the main subject understandable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “solid reason to survive,” “crisis of money,” “working with unsatisfaction” and “build the own business.” Repetition of “bad situation” and “improve” also limits precision. Aim to learn common collocations for employment and financial hardship, and check whether a phrase sounds natural in context. More precise vocabulary would help you express the distinction between enduring a difficulty and taking practical steps to change it.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, including conditional ideas such as “if job is a permanent and also you don't have any second option” and a contrast introduced by “instead of.” This shows an effort to connect ideas rather than relying only on short statements. However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in articles, agreement, verb forms and sentence boundaries can make the reader pause. For example, “some individual believe” needs plural agreement, while “if anyone have” has an incorrect verb form; the opening sentence also lacks a clear grammatical structure. Practise building accurate sentences with one main clause and a clearly controlled subordinate clause, then check agreement, articles and punctuation.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.