Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-10-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Some people argue that a better way to improve a bad situation is to accept it or depend upon a faith. While others believe that fighting is a resonable idea instead of blindly believing on the faith. This essay is going to discuss both the aspects, and at the last, i will share my perspectives.
On the one hand, accepting a bad situation is consider a good idea because it stops situation becoming worser. A person fighting for a bad situation can impact their mental health as well as personal profile. Instead of arguing, accepting the fact and searching a new path is consider more appropriate. For example, some people are unsatisfied with their job or position. So, if they try to fight with their superiors and got removed from the available position then it will cause a significant impact on their character, financial probelms will rose up. It is better not to think such situation and search for a better opportunity and belive on faith.
On the other hand, people belive that fighting is necessary to improve the situation. If they do not fight, how would they know what the consequences are. Leaving everything on faith and being afraid of the result is not a good way to solve the probelms. For example, some people are unsatisfied with their salaries according to their work. If they remain silent, the situation is never going to be changed. Instead of that, they proposed to their manger properly they something might be possible. Their salaries might be incresed.
In conclusion, I believe that people should act wisely according to the situation. If they are not satisfied over the judgment of high profile people, they can fight for it. However, fighting for an unncessary things can impact their profile.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You discuss both views and give a personal position, so the response addresses the main parts of the task. The two body paragraphs are relevant: one explains why accepting a difficult situation may protect a person’s wellbeing or job prospects, while the other argues that speaking up about low pay can lead to improvement. However, some ideas are less fully developed than others. The first paragraph shifts between accepting circumstances, looking for another job, and relying on faith, without clearly distinguishing these responses. Your conclusion says people should act according to the situation, but the principle for deciding when to accept and when to challenge a problem remains general. Explain the trade-offs and support your position with a more specific example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” make the progression easy to follow, and each body paragraph has a relevant example. This meets the lower-band expectations for coherent organisation and shows some of the clearer progression associated with a stronger performance. However, connections within paragraphs are sometimes mechanical or unclear. For instance, “So, if they try to fight with their superiors and got removed” does not clearly connect the proposed action to the outcome, and “they proposed to their manger properly they something might be possible” obscures the sequence of ideas. Use clearer sentence links and pronouns, and make each example’s reasoning explicit.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use enough vocabulary to communicate the main ideas about work, money, and responding to difficulties, including terms such as “mental health,” “financial problems,” and “opportunity.” There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “superiors” and “consequences.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or awkward, which limits precision: “fighting for a bad situation,” “believing on the faith,” and “searching a new path” do not express the intended meanings naturally. Spelling errors such as “resonable,” “probelms,” and “incresed” are also noticeable. Build a more reliable set of phrases for accepting circumstances, challenging decisions, and requesting a pay rise, and check spelling during revision.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt a mix of simple and complex forms, including conditional sentences such as “If they remain silent, the situation is never going to be changed” and a contrastive opening with “While.” The overall meaning is generally recoverable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. Examples include “accepting a bad situation is consider,” where the verb form is incorrect, and “if they try … and got removed,” where the verb forms do not match. The sentence beginning “Instead of that, they proposed to their manger properly…” is also structurally incomplete and difficult to follow. Work on consistent verb forms, complete sentence construction, and punctuation around introductory clauses. More accurate control of these patterns would make your ideas easier to understand.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.