Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Though recycling wastage reduces environmental pollution and enables manufacturers to meet the larger demand of consumers at a cheaper rate, many people don't prefer to do it more. In my view, lack of awareness and limited uses of laws are the main reasons behind this carelessness, and mass education and strict enforcement of laws can play a vital role to change this situation.

People are not much aware about the negative effects of the rubbish that they throw on their surroundings. On top of that, there are not enough campaigns, meetings held for making them understand about those adverse effects. As a result, they think recycling is just a waste of time and money. Furthermore, government authorities also don't give their enough attention to this issue. Beyond that, rules aren't effectively follows by manufacturers, which are already included in the law. For example, people from rural regions are not enough concerned about the adverse effects of dusts as well as the the process and benefits of recyling those rubbish. For that reason, they don't make investment for recycling those used products.

If we think about the solutions to change these scenarios, mass education as well as mass media can play an effective role, because an educated person knows the cons of dusts as well as advantages of rycling. Moreover, medias like television, radio, social media advertisements can encourage citizens to do it by presenting the benefits of recycling. Additionally, national authorities have to allocate enough budget and make rules about the rubbish throwing. They have to give punishments to those manufacturers, who don't follow rules and throw dusts which causes severe air pollution. For instance, government can make people aware by making a national film, and advertise it in the media.

In conclusion, we can state that mass education and advertisements through medias, and stricter governemental regulations can make people informed and forced to recyle their rubbish. Because, lack of these settings causes unawareness among people about any concerning issue.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both parts of the prompt and give a clear overall position: you identify limited awareness and weak enforcement as causes, then propose education, media campaigns and stricter rules. These are relevant responses, and the example of a national film helps illustrate one possible campaign. However, some points are asserted rather than fully explained. For instance, the claim that manufacturers do not follow existing rules is not clearly connected to why households recycle less, and the rural-community example is difficult to follow. Develop the cause-and-effect links more explicitly and add a specific, realistic example showing how a proposed measure could increase recycling. This would make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, one on solutions, and a conclusion. The progression from reasons to remedies is easy to recognise, and linking phrases such as “Furthermore,” “Additionally,” and “In conclusion” help guide the reader. At times, however, cohesion feels mechanical because several transitions are used in close succession, including “On top of that,” “Furthermore,” and “Beyond that.” Some references are also unclear: “these scenarios” and “those settings” do not point precisely to a specific idea, while the manufacturer discussion interrupts the focus on public recycling habits. Use fewer, more purposeful connectors and make each paragraph’s central point and references explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “environmental pollution,” “adverse effects,” “enforcement of laws,” and “allocate enough budget.” These choices show an attempt to discuss the issue beyond basic terms. However, inaccurate word choice and collocation sometimes make the meaning awkward, as in “recycling wastage,” “limited uses of laws,” and “throw dusts.” There are also spelling errors such as “recyling,” “rycling,” and “governemental,” alongside repeated use of “dusts” where “rubbish” or “waste” is intended. Choose more natural collocations and check spelling carefully; this would make your ideas clearer and demonstrate more controlled vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including cause-and-effect clauses such as “As a result, they think recycling is just a waste of time and money” and a conditional opening in the solutions paragraph. The main ideas are generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “rules aren't effectively follows” has incorrect verb form, and “government authorities also don't give their enough attention” has an incorrect determiner pattern. In “punishments to those manufacturers, who don't follow rules and throw dusts which causes,” the relative clauses and agreement are not controlled. The final sentence fragment beginning “Because” also weakens the conclusion. Review verb forms, agreement, and complete sentence construction.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.