Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In multiple countries, people generally do not prefer to recycle their rubbish as much as they could. People try to reuse the products but they cannot because they are not enough suitable to be used again. Individuals try different techniques to make good use of products again. Sometimes they get success at this and sometimes they might fail.

People do not recycle because they don't have the right facilities. Recycling needs a proper method to reuse the products but people don't know about them. There should be proper awareness about the recycling process. Lectures should be given in schools and colleges about recycling to improve general knowledge of young generation. There should be proper rules and regulations for recycling so people can follow them.

The another reason is that the products that are being used in many countries are not made for recycling and this is why people don't recycle them. Products made of materials that cannot be recycled makes it impossible to recycle them. The companies should make products and goods that can easily be recycled. Companies should write the process of recycling on the packages of products and goods. This approach will also improve the awareness of recycling among people.

Lastly, government should also make rules and regulations to control pollution that is caused by people who do not recycle. There should be proper charges, fines and punishments on the people who do not recycle products on purpose that can be recycled. There should also be some compensation to people and return should be given to people who do recycling. This will help to increase recycling process.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses both parts of the question: it gives reasons such as inadequate facilities, limited knowledge, and products that are difficult to recycle, then proposes education, clearer packaging information, company changes, and government measures. These ideas are relevant, but several are asserted rather than explained. For example, the point that people lack facilities is followed mainly by a call for lectures, without clarifying how access to collection or sorting services affects recycling. The proposed fines and compensation are also mentioned without explaining how they would work or why they would change behaviour. Develop fewer points with specific explanations or examples, and make the relationship between each cause and solution clearer, to provide a more complete response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable overall structure: it introduces the issue, presents reasons and solutions in separate paragraphs, and uses signposts such as “The another reason” and “Lastly.” This helps the reader follow the main topics. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes loose: the opening moves from reuse attempts to occasional success or failure without clearly connecting this to the question of recycling. Repeated phrases such as “There should be proper” also make the development feel list-like, while “This approach” does not specify exactly which part of the preceding proposal it refers to. Organise each paragraph around one clear point, explain it, and use more precise referencing and varied links between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the main ideas, including relevant terms such as “facilities,” “recycling process,” “materials,” “packages,” and “fines.” The writer also attempts topic-specific phrasing, so the reader can generally understand the argument. However, the range is limited by repetition of “products,” “people,” “proper,” and “recycle,” and some combinations are unnatural or imprecise, such as “get success at this,” “increase recycling process,” and “compensation to people and return.” These choices sometimes make the intended meaning less clear. Build a wider set of accurate terms for collection, sorting, recyclable materials, and incentives, and check common word partnerships so that ideas sound natural as well as relevant.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response uses mostly straightforward sentence patterns and attempts some longer structures, including “Products made of materials that cannot be recycled makes it impossible to recycle them.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors occur in both simple and more complex sentences. Examples include “The another reason,” where the article is incorrect, and “Products made of materials … makes,” where the plural subject requires a plural verb. In “Lectures should be given … to improve general knowledge of young generation,” the article and noun phrase are not formed accurately. Repeated sentence openings with “There should be” also limit structural variety. Practise subject–verb agreement, articles, and accurate clause construction, then vary sentence forms while keeping them controlled.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.