Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In this contemporary world a pressing issue is regarding the waste management. Individuals nowadays are not much as consciuos as they have to be to solve that problem. There are several causes behind this such as lack of proper knowledge about reclying, do no aware about the consequences and deficiency of sufficient equipments. To mitigae this dilemma there should be a balanced approach of the authority and the general people by implementing several law to ensure proper waste disposal, residents should be encouraged to use biodegradable commodity.

Several reasons are provoking this issue. General people do not have the actual learning what they have to do with their daily wastes, as a consequence they throw those watage in an inapproprirate way. This leads to sewage blockage thus drainage system hampered.

In addition, insufficient facilities often discourage people to recycle their wastes. Furthermore, it is also requires a heavy amount of funding , that's why the people who are not financially affulent does not care about this.

To cope up with this phenomenon Governments and individuals should work hand in hand . Also, authority should educate people about recycling by temporary campaign and they should invest a amount of budget for waste management, therefore, people will become much aware about the results of scch incentives. Secondly there should be a strict law against the single use plastic things like bags, straws and bottles.

To conclude, many causes are behind this phenomenon , so all sorts of people should work collaborately with the government .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both parts of the question: you identify limited knowledge and inadequate recycling facilities as causes, then suggest public education, investment, and restrictions on single-use plastics. These ideas are relevant, and the reference to blocked drainage gives one consequence. However, some points are asserted rather than explained. For example, the link between recycling costs and people who are “not financially affluent” is unclear, and the proposed campaigns and laws would be stronger with an explanation of how they would change everyday behaviour. The conclusion restates the need for cooperation but does not bring the main reasons and solutions together. Develop each key point with a clear explanation or a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on causes, a paragraph on solutions, and a conclusion. Sequencing is generally clear, and signposts such as “In addition,” “Furthermore,” and “To conclude” help readers follow the discussion. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. The opening lists causes and solutions in one long sentence, while the relationship between recycling costs and people’s willingness to recycle is not made explicit. The phrase “therefore” in the solutions paragraph also does not clearly show how the proposed budget leads to greater awareness. Use clearer topic sentences and connect each explanation directly to the point it supports; this would make progression more consistent.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “waste management,” “sewage blockage,” “drainage system,” “biodegradable,” and “single use plastic.” This shows awareness of the subject and some willingness to use less common terms. However, inaccurate spelling and word choice are noticeable and sometimes make the meaning less natural: “reclying,” “watage,” “affulent,” and “scch” appear in the response, while “temporary campaign” and “biodegradable commodity” are awkward combinations. Some expressions, such as “cope up with this phenomenon,” are also not idiomatic. Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully; a smaller set of well-controlled topic terms would communicate your ideas more precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple sentences and attempts at more complex structures, including cause-and-effect clauses such as “as a consequence they throw…” and “that's why…”. The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors recur. For example, “it is also requires” combines incompatible verb forms, “the people … does not care” has subject–verb disagreement, and “there should be a strict law” does not match the plural examples that follow. Several sentences are joined with commas where a full stop or a clearer conjunction is needed, as in the opening list of causes and solutions. Review agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence boundaries, then check each sentence for a clear subject and main verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.