Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Waste recycling is a crucial thing for the good will of the world. In many countries, people create rubbish in many ways but the donot bother about handling it. There are different kinds of wastage we create, some of them are biodegradeable, while many of them can recyclable. Many countries doesnot have any concern about it. In this essay I will discuss reasons of this and solution of this problems.

Many people think that the all garbage we through will be degrade quickly because no proper knowledge about the handling of wastage. Another important reason is that they think the recycle product is not good for there health because it is already used by somone and they through it because it not useable anymore. Lastly, they think that product recycling is not individuals task, it should be done by nationally or intarnationally.

There are some solutions to change the views of many nationality. Firstly, educating people about the consiquence of throwing waste without sorting it. Than, we can seperate bin leveling with name of different types of rubbish. For instance, degradeable waste, medical waste and, recyclable waste keep in different bins. Finally, we can organized seminar, talk showes or programme to concern people that world is our we should keep our worl clean by creating less waste and recycle which can be reusedable.

In conclusion, many countries doesnot know about recycle. If they get the proper knowledge about recycling, they will be an important contributor for the world wellbeing. If individual do there work properl, the nation as well as wolrd can benefited.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the question: it gives reasons people do not recycle and suggests ways to improve participation. The explanations about limited knowledge, doubts about recycled products, and the belief that recycling is someone else’s responsibility are relevant. The proposed education, labelled bins, and public programmes also answer the second part. However, some points are asserted rather than explained: for example, the concern that recycled products are unhealthy would be stronger with a specific example or clarification, and the national-responsibility idea is not developed. The conclusion restates the general message but does not draw together the main reasons and solutions. Develop each key idea with a brief explanation or example to make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure, with an introduction, a paragraph on causes, a paragraph on solutions, and a conclusion. The sequence is easy to follow, and signposts such as “Another important reason,” “Firstly,” and “Finally” help readers identify the progression. This coherent organisation is a strength. Some linking is mechanical, however, and the repeated use of “they think” and list-style transitions makes the argument feel more like a sequence of points than a connected discussion. A few references are also unclear, such as “this problems” and “which can be reusedable,” where the reader must infer the intended connection. Use more varied links between cause and effect, and make pronoun references explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The response uses relevant topic vocabulary, including “recycling,” “biodegradable,” “medical waste,” “sorting,” and “recyclable waste,” so the main subject is generally clear. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate or awkward choices make parts difficult to understand. Examples include “good will of the world,” “product recycling,” “concern people,” and “reusedable”; these do not express the intended ideas naturally. Spelling errors such as “biodegradeable,” “consiquence,” and “intarnationally” also reduce precision. Build a reliable set of collocations for waste management and public awareness, and check word forms and spelling. Prefer precise phrases such as “environmental well-being,” “raise public awareness,” and “reusable materials.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The essay attempts both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast with “while” and a reason introduced by “because.” The paragraphing also helps make the intended meaning accessible. However, control of sentence structure and basic grammar is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include “Many countries doesnot have,” “the all garbage,” “they through it,” and “If individual do there work,” which show problems with agreement, articles, verb forms, and sentence construction. Some longer sentences, particularly the final sentence of the solutions paragraph, are difficult to parse because several ideas are joined without clear grammatical relationships. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement and build longer sentences from clearly controlled clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.