Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays,in many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could. There are several reasons for this problems, such as a lack of awareness and poor recycling facilities.Nevertheless, government and individuals can take some steps to improve the situation.

Another significant reason is that some people do not comprehend the importance of recycling.They may not khown how much waste can damage the environment.In addition, some people believe that recycling is arduous that takes too much effort.

People's busy lifestyle can also be a reason.Many individuals are hectic in studying and working,and they do not spend extra time to separate their rubbish.For instance, plastic bags and bottles remain in the environment from many years and cause pollution Furthermore,governments are also play an important role to separate their recycling bins in homes, schools and public places.They can also make recycling centers more easily available so that people can recycling their waste without long distances.

Today, In poor countries, plastic pollution is rising day by day.Moreover, mostly people utilize plastic paper, and bottles in houses, hospitals,and markets. On the other hand, plastic pollution can also harmful to individuals and for their health.From my perspective, governments should restriction on all plastic things.

To conclude, low recycling rates are primarily caused by a lack of awareness, limited facilities and people's busy lifestyle. Better recycling, education systema and appropriate rewards can encourage people to recycle more. Although, governments and individuals bother work together work, this amount of waste can be greatly reduce.In my opinion, people should low plastic use and don not rubbish on the road, thus could overcome on pollution.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion5.5
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You address both parts of the question: you identify causes such as limited awareness, inconvenient recycling, and busy routines, then suggest education, better access to bins and centres, and government action. Your conclusion also gives a clear general position that cooperation could reduce waste. However, some points are less fully developed than others. For example, the claim that governments should restrict plastic is not explained in detail, and the proposed “appropriate rewards” are introduced only at the end. The example about plastic remaining in the environment supports the topic but does not clearly illustrate why people fail to recycle. Develop each cause-and-solution link with a specific explanation or example, and make the proposed actions more precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has an overall structure, moving from causes to possible actions and then to a conclusion, and paragraph breaks help distinguish some of these stages. Linking expressions such as “In addition,” “Furthermore,” and “To conclude” show an effort to connect ideas. However, progression is not consistently clear: the paragraph beginning “Today, In poor countries” shifts to plastic pollution and health without clearly connecting this discussion to the earlier causes or solutions. Some transitions are mechanical, and the final sentence combines several recommendations in a confusing way. Organise the body into clearly focused paragraphs—one for causes and one for solutions—and use references and transitions that make the relationship between each point explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “recycling facilities,” “separate their rubbish,” “recycling centers,” and “plastic pollution,” so the reader can follow the main subject. There are also attempts at more specific language, such as “arduous” and “appropriate rewards.” However, noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision: “khown,” “hectic” for busy, “plastic paper,” and “restriction on all plastic things” are unclear or unnatural in context. Some phrases are also repetitive, particularly references to plastic and pollution. Build accuracy by learning common collocations for waste management and checking word forms and spelling; choose straightforward, natural expressions when you are unsure of a more advanced term.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a reason clause in “They may not … how much waste can damage the environment” and a conditional idea in the conclusion. The main message is generally recoverable, but errors in sentence structure, verb forms, agreement, articles, and punctuation occur across the response. Examples include “recycling is arduous that takes,” “governments are also play,” “can also harmful,” and “this amount of waste can be greatly reduce.” Several sentences also run together, such as the sentence ending “cause pollution” before “Furthermore.” Practise building accurate clauses with one clear subject and verb, and check verb forms after modal verbs and auxiliaries. More reliable control of these patterns would make your ideas easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.