Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-08-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could. This is a serious environmental problem because a large amount of waste is sent to landfills. There are several reasons for this situation, but some effective solutions can also be introduced.

One main reason is that many people do not have enough knowledge about recycling. They may not know which items can be recycled or how to separate different types of rubbish. Another reason is that recycling facilities are not available in some areas. People may find it difficult to recycle if there are no separate bins or collection services near their homes. In addition, some people think recycling takes too much time and effort, so they simply throw everything into one bin.

There are several ways to improve this situation. Firstly, governments should provide separate recycling bins in homes, schools and public places. They should also make recycling services easy and convenient for everyone. Secondly, schools and media can educate people about the importance of recycling and its benefits for the environment. For example, people can be taught how recycling reduces pollution and saves natural resources. Finally, governments could give rewards to households that recycle regularly and impose fines on people who waste recyclable materials.

In conclusion, people recycle less because of a lack of knowledge, facilities and motivation. Governments, schools and communities should work together to make recycling easier and encourage people to develop better habits.I think that why the we do change in the

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion7.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: reasons for low recycling rates and potential solutions. The ideas are relevant and logically developed, such as the lack of knowledge, insufficient facilities, and the need for government intervention. The position is clear throughout, and the essay follows a standard structure. However, the conclusion ends with an incomplete, incoherent sentence ('I think that why the we do change in the'), which slightly detracts from the overall task completion. Despite this, the main body paragraphs provide sufficient support for the arguments presented, meeting the requirements for a Band 7 score.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.0

The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central theme, and the transition between the causes and solutions is smooth. Cohesive devices such as 'One main reason', 'Another reason', 'In addition', and 'Firstly' are used effectively to guide the reader. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate the introduction, body, and conclusion. While the final sentence is fragmented, the overall structure remains coherent and easy to follow throughout the majority of the text.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is adequate for the task and allows for clear communication. The student uses topic-specific terms like 'landfills', 'recyclable materials', and 'natural resources' correctly. While the range is sufficient, it lacks the more sophisticated or idiomatic expressions that would characterize a higher band score. There is some repetition of basic structures, but the word choice is generally precise and appropriate for the context. The minor errors do not impede understanding.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The essay demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. Most sentences are grammatically accurate, and punctuation is generally handled well. There is good control over subject-verb agreement and tense usage. However, the final sentence is grammatically broken and incomplete, which is a noticeable error. Despite this, the majority of the text is error-free, and the complexity of the sentences used is sufficient to convey the intended meaning clearly. The errors present are not frequent enough to impede communication.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.