Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-08-20
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.
Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The increasing prevalence of salvage about the waste materials has attracted considerable attention in the contemporary society.This essay will examine reasons behind this phenomenon and evaluate whether it has a positive or negative developments.
One primary reason is that, many individuals are often bored when it comes to reprocessing their used products. This is because the growing number of unwanted products with significant variation. For example, pen is considered to be a part of waste disposal for many individuals across the country after being used once and not adding refill to it and purchasing another one has been observed in almost most of the cases by the student. Therefore, these factors have contributed significantly to the development of this phenomenon.
In my opinion, this development leads to negative consequences in various cases. To address this challenges, several measures should be implemented. To begin with, people should take the note of this issue and reduce its effects as much as possible. For example, after eating packets of one kind of chips or wheels,the one should put it into the garbage rather than throwing it somewhere else not also on roads.As the plastic would surely sent to re-use after being with correct place where it should be along with several other waste disposals.Consequently, the overall impact can be regarded as detrimental.
Overall, I believe that it represents a negative impact and also has adverse effects to the environment.Therefore, the essay reaches to the clear conclusion on the occasion of recycle and reprocess of any type of waste material.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The response addresses both parts of the prompt, but the development is inconsistent. The reasons provided for low recycling rates are somewhat vague, and the explanation regarding 'boredom' and 'pen disposal' lacks clarity and logical depth. While the essay suggests measures to improve the situation, the ideas are under-developed and the connection between the proposed actions and the broader issue is tenuous. The position is stated, but the arguments lack the necessary support and academic rigor required for a higher band. The essay also misinterprets the prompt by discussing whether the phenomenon is positive or negative, rather than focusing on the reasons for the lack of recycling.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organised into paragraphs, but the progression of ideas is often disjointed. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'To begin with' and 'Consequently', but they are sometimes used mechanically or inappropriately, such as the transition into the conclusion. The referencing is occasionally unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the writer's train of thought. Paragraphing is present, but the internal structure of the paragraphs lacks logical flow, particularly in the second paragraph where the example of the pen does not clearly support the main point about recycling habits.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The vocabulary is limited and often inaccurate. Phrases like 'salvage about the waste materials' and 'reprocessing their used products' are awkward and do not convey the intended meaning precisely. There is a reliance on basic vocabulary, and attempts to use more formal language often result in errors in collocation and word choice. For instance, 'the one should put it into the garbage' is unnatural. The range is insufficient to express complex ideas clearly, and the errors in word choice occasionally impede the reader's understanding of the argument.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but the complex ones are frequently faulty. There are numerous grammatical errors, including issues with article usage ('the pen', 'the one'), subject-verb agreement, and sentence fragments. Punctuation is also inconsistent, with missing spaces after periods and commas. These errors are frequent and sometimes make the text difficult to read, although the general meaning is usually recoverable. The control over grammar is limited, and the frequency of errors prevents the response from reaching a higher band.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.