Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-09-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In many nations, individuals lack the knowledge to recycle the waste efficiently and effective. In this essay we will discuss about what could be reasons behind it and how we can improve the waste management to optimise the full potential of recycling.

Traditionally, all the rubbish were thrown in landfills as many individuals didn't have the knowledge of waste management and it's importance. Furthermore, operating a waste management plant is heavy relied on advance equipments and manpower which many nations might not have. Moreover, government might have other priorities rather than providing training of waste collection and recycling. Individuals in India throw all their rubbish in rivers and open field, as it clearly shows the lack of knowledge and importance of recycling. It is also one

Government should be responsible for the changing the concept about waste. They should heavy invest in training and providing appropriate skills to separate rubbish which are recyclable and which are not. Strict measures should be taken to implement the waste collection and it's processing measures. Investing in waste collection and processing plants are another remedy to solve the issue of rubbish. China recently earn 2 billion dollars from recycling e-waste which has precious elements like gold and silver. Recycling is also a source to earn revenue for the nation.

In conclusion, investment in training and waste processing equipments could provide the opportunity to recycle more waste. Recycling is not only about reuse scared resources but also giving new life to older, useless products.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt: reasons for low recycling rates and potential solutions. However, the essay is slightly under the 250-word minimum, which impacts the development of ideas. While the points regarding lack of knowledge and government investment are relevant, they are somewhat underdeveloped. For instance, the mention of India is a good start but lacks depth. The conclusion is also quite abrupt. To reach a higher band, you should expand on your arguments with more detailed explanations or additional examples to ensure the response is fully developed and meets the length requirement.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay is organized into clear paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. You use some cohesive devices like 'Furthermore', 'Moreover', and 'In conclusion' to link ideas. However, the flow is occasionally mechanical, and some transitions feel abrupt. For example, the sentence 'It is also one' at the end of the second paragraph is incomplete and disrupts the logical progression. Improving the variety of linking words and ensuring that every sentence is complete will help create a more natural and cohesive flow throughout the essay.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

You demonstrate an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, using terms like 'waste management', 'optimise', and 'revenue'. However, there are several instances of inaccurate word choice and collocation, such as 'heavy relied on' (should be 'heavily reliant on'), 'government might have other priorities rather than providing' (should be 'priorities instead of providing'), and 'reuse scared resources' (should be 'scarce resources'). These errors do not prevent understanding, but they indicate a need for more precise control over word forms and collocations to reach a higher band.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that affect the accuracy of the writing. Examples include 'all the rubbish were thrown' (subject-verb agreement error), 'it's importance' (confusing 'its' with 'it is'), and 'government should be responsible for the changing' (incorrect article usage). Additionally, there are issues with verb forms, such as 'China recently earn' (should be 'earned'). While the meaning is generally clear, these persistent errors in basic grammar and punctuation limit the score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.