Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-09-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In today's modern ear, an growing number of individuals do not recycle their trash as mush as they expected. There are numerous reason behind this phenomenon that why these people do not performing this operation. In this essay I will discuss why I aruge this happens as well as what should be done to alter this trend.

On the one hand, there are various factors that why people do not recycle their waste. First of all, in today comtemporary society every individuals are busy in their daily work or study. Due to this people do not enough time to recyle their trash. For instance, many American people are busy in their work and often they do two shifts one on day time and another on night time. Therefore they have not enough time to recycle their rubbish. Secondly, in many countries, government have not such good idea to create a specific places for waste to be recycle in the future by particular companies. As a result, most citizens do not recover their trash.

On the other hand, one of the major factor to change this trend and attract people toward to recycle their trash has social awarness. To elaborate it further, People should be acknowledge about how rubbish things are recycle and how can you get benefits by recycling it. To cite an example, children in Japan are more likely to keep each and everything in their pocket until a dust bin was not find, when they find it, then they drop their waste into it. This is due to every Japnies children as well as adults are aware about how to keep the environment safe and clean from pollution and other bad circumstances.

In conclusion, in today's competative world, public havn't enough time to recycle their rubbish as many of those busy in their work or study and authorities have not any sutable places to keep the trash on one place to be recycle later. Subsequently, to overcome this trend soical awareness can significantly change this issue by promoting positive messages to public.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses both parts of the prompt, exploring the reasons why people do not recycle as much as they could, such as busy modern lifestyles and a lack of proper government infrastructure, and offering solutions like social awareness campaigns. However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and repetitive. For instance, the discussion on people being too busy is stretched across paragraphs without adding deeply new insights, and the explanation of government infrastructure remains quite vague. The writer's position is clear throughout the essay, but the examples provided, such as the mention of American work schedules or Japanese children, are a bit simplistic and under-developed. To reach a higher band, the ideas would need more thorough explanation and varied supporting evidence. Overall, it satisfies the basic requirements of the task by covering all parts of the prompt.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay is divided into four logical paragraphs with a clear introduction and conclusion. There is an overall progression of ideas, moving from reasons to solutions. However, cohesive devices are often faulty, mechanical, or unnatural, such as 'To elaborate it further' and 'To cite an example'. Additionally, referencing and pronoun use can be confusing, as seen in phrases like 'that why these people do not performing this operation' and 'how can you get benefits'. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate different parts of the prompt, but internal cohesion within sentences and paragraphs frequently falters due to awkward transitions and grammatical slips. While the structure is coherent enough to follow the writer's line of thought, the management of cohesive devices remains at a lower band level.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The lexical resource is limited and heavily impacted by frequent spelling and word-choice errors that occasionally hinder communication. Examples of non-standard usage include 'modern ear' instead of 'era', 'an growing number', 'mush' instead of 'much', 'comtemporary', and 'Japnies'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'phenomenon', 'infrastructure', and 'competative', but these are often marred by spelling mistakes or awkward collocations like 'do not performing this operation'. While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the general topic of recycling and environmental awareness, the high frequency of basic lexical and orthographic errors prevents the response from achieving a higher score.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The student attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but control over grammar is weak throughout the text. There are frequent grammatical errors, such as subject-verb agreement issues ('every individuals are', 'public havn't', 'government have not'), tense confusion ('when a dust bin was not find'), and malformed verb phrases ('do not performing this operation', 'are recycle'). Many complex sentences are faulty, leading to awkward phrasing like 'There are numerous reason behind this phenomenon that why these people do not performing this operation.' Although meaning is usually retrievable despite these errors, the high density of inaccurate structures places this submission firmly in the band 5 range for grammatical accuracy and range.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.