Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 4.5)

Recycling is become increasingly serious in many nations.Although rubbish garbadge threatens many societies. Their effects can also be combated successfully. This eassy looks at some of the problems caused by recycling on society and suggest some solutions to the problems.

Rubbish causes multiple problems. The side effects are very obvious. For example harful chemicals and plastic waste in some cases, such as rubbish from factories even leads to serious problem. The second effect is directly impacts on people who wasted rubbish and become even more health problems. Therefore, this situation is worse for any country.

However, the menace of recycling can be fought Eduction is the main way to tackle this issue. people need to be aware of this effects so that they can avoid this problem. In addition to change this, the government could also encourage to people with defining meaning of waste and handle to policies in certain types of ways.This is also good approach because with awareness of recycling people understand morei this topic and it is very helpful to maintaining environmental structure. Thus, everyone should unite to cust this issue from this planet.

In conclusion rubbish is a serious issue, because it causes harmful effects on people's health and their well-being. The best approach to deal with it are to educate people about its damaging effects and governments involvement in making stricker polices. The next step including recycling polices and terms of service need to follow complex instructions and individual needs to take responsibility to maintain planet.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response makes an attempt to discuss the issue and offer solutions, but it does not answer the question accurately or develop its ideas sufficiently. The task asks why people fail to recycle and how this can be changed; instead, the essay mainly describes the harmful effects of rubbish and refers to “the menace of recycling,” which reverses the intended meaning. Education and government action are relevant possible solutions, but the explanation of how these would increase recycling remains vague. For example, “defining meaning of waste” and “handle to policies” do not clearly identify practical measures. To strengthen the response, explain specific reasons for low recycling, such as limited facilities or lack of awareness, then develop realistic solutions linked directly to those causes.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate body paragraphs and a conclusion. It also uses basic linking expressions such as “For example,” “However,” “In addition,” and “In conclusion,” which help signal stages in the response. However, there is no clear progression from the causes of low recycling to solutions: the first body paragraph discusses rubbish’s effects, while the next shifts to education and government action. Some connections are difficult to follow, particularly “This is also good approach because with awareness of recycling people understand morei this topic.” The conclusion introduces further ideas about policies and individual responsibility rather than clearly summarising the argument. Organise the body around the two parts of the question and make each sentence’s relationship to the previous one explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response attempts topic-related vocabulary, including “rubbish,” “plastic waste,” “harmful effects,” “education,” and “environmental,” so the reader can identify the general subject. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate or misspelled choices make meaning unclear. Examples include “garbadge,” “harful,” “Eduction,” and “stricker,” as well as the confusing phrase “the menace of recycling,” which appears to mean the problem of inadequate recycling. Phrases such as “handle to policies” and “cust this issue” are not natural or precise in this context. Build a more accurate set of terms for the task—such as recycling facilities, public awareness, collection services and incentives—and check spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

There is some variety in sentence forms, including a concession structure (“Although rubbish…”) and a conditional purpose clause (“so that they can…”). Basic meaning is sometimes recoverable, but frequent errors in sentence construction and grammatical forms make several sentences difficult to understand. For example, “Recycling is become” has an incorrect verb form, and “The best approach … are” has faulty subject–verb agreement. The opening fragment beginning “Although” is not joined to a complete main clause, while “The second effect is directly impacts” combines incompatible structures. Articles, plurals and punctuation also need attention, as in “a serious problem” and the run-on spacing around “ways.This.” Practise building complete sentences with one clear main clause, then check verb forms and agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.