Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-15
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.
Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
In today's fast-paced world , numerous individuals often do not prefer to recycle the grabage as much as they could. Low global recycling rates stem from a combination of behavioral, infrastructural, and economic barriers. However, i believe that , we could tackle this challenge through enhancing infrastructure, launch educational campigns , introduce rules and regulations, and invest in technology.
Many people often don't reccycle the rubbish because of several reasons. Firstly, lack of awarness and education; individuals do not understand how to sort waste properly , or they remain unaware of the damage to the environment caused by sending items such as paper, plastic and glass in general landfills. Secondly, inconvinent infrastructure; when dedicated bins are missing, spares and poorly labled in neighourhood, streets and work places people default to throwing everything into a single bin for convinence. In addition,some socities and companies view recycling programs as overly expensive, complicated or logisticaly unviable compared to standard waste disposal. Therefore, i think numerous awarness , infrastructure and cost related issues are the main reasons.
On the other hand, this obstacle could be addressed through by approaching several measures . Firstly, goverments and municipalities must place clear ,separate recycling bins in public places , residential areas and commerical hubs alongside reliable collection schedules. Moreover, public awarness programs via schools, social mdeia and community workshops can teach the citizends how to separate the waste and highlight the long term ecological benefits. Furthermore, Enforcing strict waste-sorting laws (such as fines for non-compliance) paired with positive reinforcement—like deposit-return schemes or monetary reward programs for returned bottles and cans—can shift social habits. In addition, Supporting affordable, local recycling technology helps reduce processing costs and makes large-scale material reuse economically sustainable.
In conclusion, individuals often do not recycle their rubbish because of lack of knowledge, poor infrastructure and costs issues , however, these obstacles can be address through enforcing regualtions , awarness programs and using affordable local technology .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5
The response addresses both parts of the question and maintains a clear position: low recycling is linked to awareness, infrastructure and cost, while several measures are proposed to improve it. The causes are supported with relevant detail, such as people not knowing how to sort waste and the absence of clearly labelled bins. The solutions are also specific, including collection schedules, school and social-media campaigns, fines, deposit-return schemes and local technology. This range and development make the response convincing. Some points, particularly the claim that recycling is viewed as too expensive or logistically unviable, would benefit from a concrete example or further explanation of how this affects participation. Overall, the ideas are well extended, though a little more precise support would strengthen them further.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0
The essay has a clear overall progression: the introduction presents the issue and position, the second paragraph explains causes, the third gives solutions, and the conclusion summarises the argument. Sequencing markers such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” “Moreover,” and “Furthermore” help readers follow the points, and the paragraphing is appropriate. However, the repeated use of these signposts makes some transitions feel formulaic, and the long list of proposed measures in the solutions paragraph could be grouped more clearly—for example, by separating public provision and education from incentives and technology. The conclusion also repeats the main points rather than drawing them together in a more developed final statement. The organisation remains clear throughout, but more varied and less conspicuous linking would improve flow.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
The response uses an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “infrastructural barriers,” “landfills,” “waste-sorting laws,” “deposit-return schemes,” and “economically sustainable.” These choices help explain both the causes and possible interventions. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, although some combinations are not natural or precise, such as “do not prefer to recycle” and “approaching several measures.” Spelling errors—including “grabage,” “awarness,” “inconvinent,” and “regualtions”—are noticeable, as are word-form and collocation problems such as “numerous awarness.” These do not prevent understanding, but they reduce accuracy and polish. Aim to check spelling carefully and learn common academic collocations so that the vocabulary you already attempt sounds more natural and controlled.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including a cause-and-effect explanation and a conditional-style recommendation: “when dedicated bins are missing … people default to throwing everything into a single bin.” Most ideas remain understandable, and the response includes several longer sentences with multiple clauses. Some grammatical errors nevertheless recur. For example, “this obstacle could be addressed through by approaching” combines incompatible constructions, while “these obstacles can be address” has an incorrect verb form. There are also errors with articles, agreement and sentence punctuation, as in “because of lack of knowledge” and the comma placement around “however” in the conclusion. Work on proofreading verb forms and clause boundaries, and practise building complex sentences accurately rather than adding several ideas to one sentence.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.