Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is true that, in many countries , people don't recycle their garbage but they should be do that. This essay will articulate some of its problems such as rubbish scattered on roads and how garbage mix in oxygen and causes air pollution and propose some possible solutions of alleviate this.

To commence with, as far as i consider that how trash spread everywhere on streets and public areas is a big problem. This creates challenges on public transport and accident. It creates a big difficulty on heart patients.

In other hand, this causes pollution which is a big problem. Some people through garbage on rivers and polluting the water. This creates air pollution and water pollution. Bad air harmful for liver patients and breathe cancer patients and how water is harmful for people and animals who drink from rivers and ponds. For example, bresth problem patients faces a lot of problems for this and some of left their lives.

To tackle it, we can start a cleaning organisation or work on recycle and reuse the plastic objects. we can a less use of plastic and not throw garbage on roads

To conclude, garbage through on outside is a big trouble for people. Government should be action on it abd residents follow up rules.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You address both parts of the question by mentioning possible consequences of poor recycling and suggesting action, including recycling and reusing plastic. However, the response only minimally answers the task: it does not explain why people fail to recycle, which is a central part of the question. The effects you describe, such as rubbish on streets and pollution, are relevant but do not substitute for reasons behind people’s behaviour. The proposed solutions are also brief and not explained—for example, “start a cleaning organisation” does not show how this would increase recycling. The response is 36 words below the required minimum, which further limits the development of your ideas. Add clear causes and explain how each practical solution addresses them.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

There is some organisation: you introduce the topic, use separate paragraphs for problems and solutions, and provide a concluding statement. Basic signposting such as “To commence with,” “In other hand,” and “To conclude” helps show the intended structure. However, progression is uneven because the essay discusses effects rather than first establishing reasons, and the solutions paragraph is very short. Some links are unclear or inaccurate, such as “This creates a big difficulty on heart patients,” where the connection to the preceding point is not explained. The repeated use of “This creates” also makes cohesion mechanical. Build a clearer sequence—causes, consequences, then solutions—and use pronouns and linking phrases that make relationships between ideas explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use a basic range of topic-related vocabulary, including “recycle,” “garbage,” “pollution,” “public areas,” and “reuse.” This is enough to communicate the general subject, but vocabulary is repetitive and some word choices or collocations make meaning difficult to follow. For instance, “garbage mix in oxygen” does not clearly express the intended environmental effect, while “through garbage” appears to mean “throw garbage.” There are also spelling errors such as “bresth,” and phrases like “breathe cancer patients” are unclear. Aim to use precise, natural expressions for causes and effects, and check spelling and word forms. Replacing repeated general words with accurate topic vocabulary will make your points easier to understand.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response relies mainly on short, simple statements, with limited control of more complex sentence forms. Frequent errors sometimes make the intended meaning difficult to understand. Examples include “they should be do that,” “as far as i consider that how trash spread,” and “Government should be action on it.” There are also problems with subject–verb agreement and sentence construction, as in “patients faces,” and with articles and plural forms. Capitalisation and punctuation are inconsistent, including the lowercase “i” and spaces before commas. Practise forming accurate basic clauses first, then combine related ideas using structures such as “because” and “which.” Proofreading for verb forms, agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries would improve clarity.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.