Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

People from many different countries does not recycle their unnecessary and rubbish waste as much as they could. Recycling declined over the years as people attributed to waste their rubbish staff that meant to be recycled.

Recycling is one of the best process wih 3R priciples that provide the guidance to reuse the waste as a new object. Peoples assumed to be contributed to recycling of the rubbish goods and wastes to build a strong natural surrounding but some thoughts to throw the waste rather than recycle it. Despite that people spend to buy unnecessary products, when it comes to recycle the same then they prefer to throw it in dustbin and garbage bags than reconsider it for a useful product.

It is one of the growing prolems of various nations that people are less aware about waste management and improving ecosystem. This lack a huge difference in modern day societies because of poor infrastructure and knowlegde gaps. Waste management is a time consuming process as it contains sorting of extra materials like old toys and metals. Thus people refuses these taskes as they have poor time management which effect their convenience.

However, this problem is a leading cause in developed and developing nations. They should work on enhancing waste management and their ecosystem by developing better infrastructure and buildings. People should questionned the goverment about " does goverment really recycled their rubbish product or not"? Goverment should take necessary action regarding the collection of recycled products by bringing laws and policies.Morever, there are some developed nations such as germany, england and france known for their best waste management system, we should admire them.

In conclusion, Taking steps toward recycling the product are essential for any ccountry to grow their economy. We also should contributed to the recycling movements. As a result , it also save our enviornment and nature. Even if their is shortage of time, everyone should pay attention for recycling not in weekdays but in weekends.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both questions: you suggest that limited awareness, poor infrastructure, and lack of time discourage recycling, and you propose better facilities, government action, and public pressure. These are relevant points, but several remain general or unclear. For example, the claim that sorting is time-consuming is not explained with a specific example, and the recommendation to develop “buildings” does not make clear what recycling provision is needed. The discussion of Germany, England, and France is also brief and does not show which practices other countries could adopt. Your position—that governments and individuals both need to act—is present, but it would be stronger if each cause were linked directly to a practical, explained solution.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, paragraphs on causes and solutions, and a conclusion. This gives the reader some overall organisation. However, progression within paragraphs is uneven: the second paragraph moves from the benefits of recycling to people buying unnecessary products without clearly connecting these ideas. Linking expressions such as “Despite that,” “Thus,” and “However” are sometimes used inaccurately or do not show the relationship between the sentences. References such as “this problem” and “they” can also be unclear. To improve, organise each body paragraph around one main point, then explain it and connect it explicitly to the task. Use fewer, more precise transitions and make pronoun references unmistakable.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “waste management,” “infrastructure,” “ecosystem,” and “laws and policies,” which helps communicate the subject. However, the range is limited by repeated use of “waste,” “rubbish,” and “recycle,” while several word choices or combinations are inaccurate and sometimes make meaning difficult to follow. For instance, “rubbish staff” does not convey the intended meaning, and “recycling of the rubbish goods” is unnatural. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “prolems,” “knowlegde,” and “enviornment.” Build a more reliable set of recycling-related expressions and check spelling and collocations carefully. More precise vocabulary would make your explanations clearer and less repetitive.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both short statements and some longer sentences, including clauses introduced by “as,” “because,” and “when.” However, the range is limited, and attempts at more complex structures often contain errors. Subject–verb agreement is frequently inaccurate: “people … does not,” “people refuses,” and “it also save” should use plural or matching verb forms. Other problems include “people should questionned” and “we should contributed,” where the verb form after a modal is incorrect. Sentence boundaries and punctuation also need attention, particularly in “policies.Morever” and the question embedded in the government sentence. Practise accurate basic sentence patterns first, then add subordinate clauses while checking agreement, verb forms, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.