Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-31

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

In many parts of the world, people do not recycle their waste material as much as they could. I believe it is largely due to the unawareness of masses and difficult nature of the recycling procedures. To solve these, government shall raise awareness through media and reward those who practice recycling.

People across world may know the hazards of land pollution but they do not know about the treatment of rubbish. As a result, our streets turned into heaps of garbage. Moreover, even if some of the world population know regarding recycling. The procedures are not only costly but also not easily accessible to everyone. For instance, recycling bins are a rarity in countries like Pakistan and India. In addition to this, the recycling plants are far away from residential areas. So a person would need to spend his time, effort and money to get some items recycled. Therefore, people do not wish to recycle their rubbish as much as they should do.

In order to address the aforementioned causes, state-level policies have to be put in order. First of all, governments should use mass media to raise awareness regarding the need of recycling and how important it is to safeguard our nature. It can be coupled with award schemes to urge common men to indugle in recycling pursuits. For instance, European grocery market chains return a specific amount of money on returning the empty bottles and cans. This makes the consumer to not throw empty vessels in garbage but to recycle them in order to earn some money.

In conclusion, recycling is not executed by many individuals because they are either oblivious of the phenomena or do not find the practice cost effective. In order to resolve these issues, recycling strategies must be formulated and executed on ground for awareness and encouraging common people.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You address both parts of the question and maintain a clear position: low recycling is linked to limited awareness and practical barriers, while media campaigns and incentives are proposed as solutions. The examples of scarce recycling bins in Pakistan and India and bottle-return schemes in European grocery chains help make the points relevant. Your explanation of the barriers is reasonably extended, especially the time, effort and expense involved. However, the awareness solution is less fully developed than the incentive example: explain what information campaigns should teach and how they might change behaviour. The conclusion restates the main ideas but remains general about what policies should be implemented. More specific development would make the response more complete and persuasive.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall progression: an introduction presents causes and solutions, the first body paragraph explains barriers, the second proposes action, and the conclusion summarises the argument. Linking expressions such as “Moreover,” “For instance,” and “In order to address” help guide the reader, and paragraphing is appropriate. Some connections are less smooth or precise, however. “Moreover, even if some of the world population know regarding recycling” is an incomplete, awkward transition, and “To solve these” refers back to the causes without naming them clearly. The conclusion also introduces “strategies” without specifying how they connect to the earlier proposals. Use cohesive devices selectively and make references explicit so the progression feels more natural.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “land pollution,” “recycling procedures,” “residential areas,” “mass media,” and “award schemes.” These choices allow you to discuss both causes and remedies, and some less common expressions show an attempt at precision. At times, however, word choice and collocation are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “unawareness of masses,” “treatment of rubbish,” “recycling pursuits,” and “executed on ground.” There are also spelling and form slips, including “indugle” and “phenomena” where the singular “phenomenon” is needed. These do not prevent understanding, but they limit naturalness and precision. Prefer familiar, accurate collocations and check word forms carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including cause-and-effect clauses and conditional phrasing, as in “even if…” and “In order to address…”. The main ideas remain understandable, and some sentences are controlled, such as the example about returning bottles and cans. Some grammatical errors persist, though. “People across world” needs an article, “our streets turned” needs an auxiliary verb, and “the world population know” has an agreement problem. The sentence beginning “Moreover, even if…” is also incomplete, while “This makes the consumer to not throw” uses an incorrect verb pattern. Review articles, subject–verb agreement, complete sentence structure, and verb patterns; this would improve accuracy while preserving your range.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.