Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Recycling plays an imperative role in human life in order to live in a healthy environment. In modern times , many individuals cannot use their things again in their life even they recycle their waste for further use. No doubt ,there are many reasons behind this problem yet I consider that by taking possible measures the problem can be solve .I will discuss my view points in upcoming paragraphs . To begin with , there are many reasons behind this statement .Firstly ,they want new things according to latest trends this is main reason why most of the persons cannot recycle their waste . Many teenagers often purchase random things just to show their high standards which leads large amount of rubbish in their homes. For example many students use expensive school bags and other items in school which they frequently change in class this cause problems such as excessive waste. Hence these are the main causes behind this statement which creates problems. Therefore , this problem can be solved by taking possible measures by both government and every citizen .Firstly ,official authorities must encourage individuals to use their things in sustainable way so that every item use it properly without frequently dumping into garbage .Government also promote sustainable development programs to encourage citizens for recycling the waste. In conclusion, this problem can be tackle by government and an every person by properly using their things in daily life because this help to reduce excessive waste in their countries .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses both questions: it identifies consumer demand for new, fashionable items as a reason for low recycling and proposes government encouragement and sustainable-development programmes. The example about students frequently replacing school bags helps illustrate the cause. However, the explanation is narrow and the proposed measures remain general: it is not clear how authorities would encourage recycling or what practical steps citizens should take. The opening also makes an unclear claim that people cannot reuse items even when they recycle, which does not establish a clear position. Develop the causes and solutions more fully, and make the relationship between them explicit, to provide a more complete response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, a paragraph on causes, a paragraph on solutions and a conclusion. Basic signposting such as “To begin with,” “Therefore” and “In conclusion” helps readers follow the broad direction. However, progression within paragraphs is limited, and several linking phrases feel mechanical or repetitive, including repeated use of “Firstly” and “this statement.” The conclusion largely repeats the proposed solution rather than drawing the discussion together. Some references are also unclear, such as “these are the main causes” after only one main cause has been explained. Use clearer links between each claim and its example, and organise each body paragraph around a distinct, developed point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the main ideas, and the response attempts topic-related expressions such as “sustainable development,” “excessive waste” and “latest trends.” However, the range is limited and several choices or combinations are unnatural, which sometimes makes the meaning less precise. For example, “use their things again in their life” and “show their high standards” do not express the intended ideas naturally; “dumping into garbage” is also awkward. Repetition of general words such as “things,” “problem” and “waste” further restricts precision. Build a wider set of accurate recycling and consumer-behaviour vocabulary, and check whether words combine naturally before using them.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts some longer sentences, including a reason-and-result structure beginning “Many teenagers often purchase random things,” but control is inconsistent. Errors in verb forms and agreement occur in phrases such as “the problem can be solve,” “this cause problems” and “this problem can be tackle.” Sentence construction is also faulty in “so that every item use it properly,” while missing or incorrect articles appear in “an every person.” Punctuation and spacing around commas and full stops are frequently inaccurate, making the writing harder to read. Practise forming accurate simple sentences first, then add subordinate clauses while checking subject–verb agreement, verb forms and articles.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.