Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

In many countries, people do not recycle their rubbish as much as they could.

Why do you think this is? What can be done to change this?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In recent years , environment health is mostly practiced in a most parts of the world , one such practice is recycling the garbage . Recycling is almost known and is strictly implemented in countries like Japan . Recycling is the process of collecting the garbage then taking the materials from it that can be reprocessed and then reused.

However, many people still do not understand the process of recycle . Many even fail to understand the importance of recycling . In many countries , the citizens are lack of basic education that leads to make them understand the process impossible.

In countries like India , there is huge population which makes recycling very difficult and the it takes more time to process the ideology foe better progress. Recycling takes many steps and the foremost step is taken at the stage of disposal so many do not dispose the waste properly .

Recycling can improved in many parts of world by spreading the awareness to people, by conducting campaings and taking proper measurements in the national and international level. Educating the people in rural areas or people with no proper internet access is much needed. Awards can be announced to initiate people towards the recycling process , this attracts many people towards the change in the environment , along with these there should be some strict measures and international laws to be made to make recycling very common in the world. These changes can bring together many countries follow recycling and keep the environment sustainable.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses both parts of the question: it gives reasons for low recycling, including limited understanding, inadequate education and the difficulty of managing waste in a highly populated country, then proposes awareness campaigns, education, incentives and stricter rules. These ideas are relevant, and the reference to India gives one point some context. However, several explanations remain broad or unclear. For example, the claim that population makes recycling difficult is not explained in terms of specific pressures such as collection capacity or sorting facilities, and the proposed awards are not developed with an example of how they would change behaviour. Explain the causes and show how each measure would address them more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a generally coherent structure: it introduces recycling, presents reasons for low participation, and then moves to possible solutions. Paragraphing helps distinguish these stages, and transitions such as “However” and “In countries like India” guide the reader through the discussion. At times, though, the progression within paragraphs is less clear. The sentence about population, processing time and “the ideology” combines several points without showing their relationship, while the final paragraph lists measures rather than grouping or explaining them. Some linking is also mechanical, particularly the repeated use of “and” and “along with these.” Organise related causes and solutions more clearly, and use explicit references to connect each proposal to a stated problem.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The response uses relevant topic vocabulary, including “recycling,” “disposal,” “awareness,” “rural areas” and “sustainable,” so the main ideas are understandable. It also attempts more formal expressions such as “strict measures” and “international laws.” However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or awkward, which limits precision: “environment health is mostly practiced” does not express the intended idea naturally, and “the process of recycle” and “taking proper measurements” are unsuitable forms or combinations. There are also spelling errors, including “campaings” and “foe.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling; a smaller set of well-controlled topic terms will make the argument clearer and more convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

There is an attempt to use both simple and longer sentence forms, and the overall meaning can usually be followed. However, errors in sentence structure and basic grammatical forms occur across the response. For example, “the citizens are lack of basic education” has an incorrect verb pattern, while “Recycling can improved” is missing the required verb form. In “which makes recycling very difficult and the it takes more time,” the clause is awkwardly joined and contains an unnecessary article. Punctuation spacing and comma use are also inconsistent. These issues sometimes make relationships between ideas harder to follow. Practise accurate subject–verb patterns, articles and clause joining, then proofread longer sentences for complete, correctly connected clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.