Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The bar chat illustrates the typical weekday for students in three different countries. First of all, graph shows the schedule of UK students. We assume the students sleeping ratio in UK is approximatey 8.5% and the studing ratio is about 8%. Moreover, we see ralxing ratio os students in UK is 7%. In my oppinion, these are average ratios and is suitable for human health.

Secondly, the bar chat represents the Japan students daily routine. Japan is very famous in all around the world for his mind blowing technology and developments. Sleeping ratio in japan is about 7% but the studing of students is 13% and it is very large ratio than all the given countries. In addition to this, rlaxing rate of Japan students is 4% and it is very low than all the countries.

Lastly, graph shows the percentage of sleeping in Germany is approximatey 8% and studing ratio of Germany students is 9%. At the end, relaxing ratio of germany students are given and it is 7%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You report the main figures for all three countries, and the comparisons that Japan has the highest study figure and the lowest relaxation figure are accurate. However, the response does not provide a clear overall summary of the chart’s main pattern; instead, it proceeds country by country and adds unsupported commentary such as “these are average ratios and is suitable for human health” and Japan’s technology reputation. The figures are also repeatedly described as “ratios” or percentages, although the chart gives hours in a typical weekday, not percentages. To make the report more complete and relevant, state the key contrasts in an overview and compare the countries directly, while avoiding opinions or background information not shown in the chart.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic, understandable structure: it discusses the UK, Japan and Germany in separate paragraphs, using “First of all,” “Secondly” and “Lastly” to signal the sequence. This helps the reader follow the country-by-country account. However, the organisation is mechanical and does not build towards a clear overview or comparison across the data. Some linking phrases, such as “In addition to this” and “At the end,” connect details without showing their relationship, and the Japan paragraph’s technology comment interrupts the report’s progression. Grouping the most important comparisons together and using clearer references between countries would create a more coherent line of development.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use a small set of relevant terms, including “sleeping,” “studying,” “relaxing” and “daily routine,” so the topic is generally identifiable. However, vocabulary is repetitive and several choices are inaccurate for describing this chart: “ratio” and “rate” suggest proportions, while the data represent time spent. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “chat” for “chart,” “approximatey,” “studing,” “ralxing” and “oppinion.” Phrases such as “mind blowing technology” are informal and irrelevant to a factual report. Use precise chart language consistently, and check spelling and collocations; this would make the limited range more effective and reduce the effort needed to understand the details.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

Most sentences use simple subject–verb patterns, and the reader can usually identify the country and activity being described. There are attempts to combine ideas, for example, “Sleeping ratio in japan is about 7% but the studing of students is 13%,” but the sentence is not well controlled. Agreement and article errors occur in “these are average ratios and is suitable” and “relaxing ratio … are given.” Other patterns, such as “the Japan students” and “the percentage of sleeping in Germany is,” are awkwardly formed. Sentence structures remain limited, with little accurate variety. Practise constructing clear comparisons and checking subject–verb agreement, articles and sentence boundaries to make the information easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.