Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-12
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The given bar graph illustrates the information about the typically weekdays for learners in three different nations. The data has been measured in days.
To start with, In UK, there were half and one day difference between spending days on study, relaxed mind and sleeping by learners. It were 8.5, 8 and 7 days respectively. In japan, the students spent 13 days for studying, 7 days for sleeping and they spent only 4 days for relaxing their mind.
Moving further, there were 9 days spent by tuitors for studing whereas they took 8 days to sleep. And they spent around 7 days for relaxing their body and mind.
Overall, it can be seen that the learners spent a most of days on study and they minimum days spent for relaxing in given three nations.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You report the main figures for all three countries, and the comparisons are mostly accurate: for example, you give Japan’s study and relaxation figures as 13 and 4, and Germany’s as 9 and 7. However, the response only partially develops the task. The overview says students spent the most time studying and the least relaxing, but this is not true across all countries: in the UK, sleeping (8.5) exceeds studying (8), and in Germany, studying is highest. The opening also incorrectly says the data is measured in days; the chart gives hours in a typical weekday. The response is 134 words, below the required 150, which limits the detail provided. Add a clear, accurate overview and explain the key contrasts across the three countries.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, country-by-country details, and a concluding overview. Sequencing is generally easy to follow, with transitions such as “To start with” and “Moving further” signalling a change in focus. However, the progression is somewhat mechanical, and the final overview repeats a general claim rather than drawing together the comparisons. The reference in “there were 9 days spent by tuitors” is also unclear because the country is not named in that sentence, even though Germany is presumably intended. Grouping the figures by activity or explicitly naming each country would make comparisons easier to track. Use linking phrases to show contrasts, not just to announce the next paragraph.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the basic information, including “studying,” “sleeping,” and “relaxing,” and you attempt some variation with “learners” and “students.” However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “typically weekdays,” “relaxed mind,” and “relaxing their body and mind.” “Tuitors” is also an incorrect word choice, while “days” is repeatedly used where the chart concerns hours. These errors make parts of the description less precise, although the main figures remain understandable. Prefer standard chart language and consistent terms for the activities, and check spelling and collocations before submitting.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You produce several understandable simple sentences and attempt longer structures, for example, “In Japan, the students spent 13 days for studying, 7 days for sleeping and they spent only 4 days for relaxing their mind.” However, grammatical control is uneven. Errors include “It were 8.5, 8 and 7 days,” where the subject and verb do not agree, and “they minimum days spent,” which has an incorrect sentence structure. The opening phrase “In UK” also needs an article, and the capitalisation of “In japan” is inconsistent. Most sentences rely on basic patterns, so practise combining comparisons accurately, using correct subject–verb agreement and articles, and proofreading punctuation and sentence boundaries.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
