Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-08-20
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The provided bar graph illustrates the investment of time in three different activities on weekends in Japan ,UK and Germany.
Overall, it is clear that the most of time utilised on studies , except in UK ,while all the countries exhibites almost similar contribution . Japan was the only country where student employs most time in studying and least time in relaxing.
In the case of UK, around 8.5% of time invested on sleeping followed by 8 % is the second highest time spent on studying .Subsequently, the rate of figure declined by almost 1% in case of relaxing . In Japan , student invest 13% of their time on studying while 4% on relaxing . Interestingly, Japanese student priortise studying over another activities . Also, 7% on sleeping on weekends.
Germany children showed their more interest in studying then other activities whereas sleeping and relaxing observed approximately 8% and 7% of time respectively.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
The student's response addresses the task by summarizing the information presented in the bar chart. However, the focus is slightly misrepresented as the response refers to activities on weekends instead of weekdays, which misaligns with the task requirements. Additionally, it could better highlight comparisons across the countries to enhance clarity. Further exploration of the data and a more coherent structure would improve the Task Achievement score.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0
The coherence and cohesion of the response are decent; however, there are issues in the flow of ideas. For example, the transition between thoughts could be enhanced to guide the reader more effectively through the comparisons. The use of cohesive devices is present but could be more varied and sophisticated. Some sentences feel disjointed, such as "Interestingly, Japanese student priortise studying over another activities," which disrupts the logical flow. Overall, the response lacks clear organization.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
Lexical resource is adequate with appropriate vocabulary choices, though there are some lapses. Phrases like "investment of time" and "shows their more interest" display an attempt to use varied language but lack precision. Misuses like "exhibites" instead of "exhibits" reflect issues in spelling and word choice. The response could benefit from incorporating more academic vocabulary and synonyms to elevate the language quality, enhancing precision and sophistication.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
Grammatical range and accuracy are generally acceptable, with only a few errors affecting clarity. Problems such as subject-verb agreement (‘student employs’ should be ‘students employ’) and inconsistent pluralization (e.g., ‘child’ instead of ‘children’) detract from the overall quality. Additionally, the use of punctuation is sometimes incorrect, particularly with commas (‘in Japan ,UK and Germany’ should be ‘in Japan, UK, and Germany’). Improvements in accuracy could raise the overall score.
Overall feedback
The student demonstrates an ability to summarize data and make comparisons, which is a key aspect of Task 1. However, it is crucial to ensure that interpretations align with the task's specifics, including referencing weekdays rather than weekends. Improving coherence would enhance the delivery of ideas, and a more varied vocabulary could strengthen the presentation. Prioritize reviewing grammar and word choice to eliminate minor errors that impact clarity. Revising sentence structures can also contribute positively to the overall fluidity of the response.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
