Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-08-31
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The bar chart compares the activites that the students allocate their time during a typical weekday in three different countries.
Overall, it is clearly show that most of the students in Japan use their time in studying, however, the amount of time allocated for relaxing is few. In United Kingdom and Germany, learners had a balance time-management, although relaxing had the least number of hours.
In Japan, it is noticeable that most students use their time studying for 13 hours a day. Relaxing, on the other hand had given the least priority at 4 hours. Learners in United Kingdom spent their time sleeping for 8.5 hours a day, whereas 8 hours for studying and 7 hours for relaxing respectively.
Furthermore, in Germany, students focused more on studying the same with Japan. Students used their 9 hours per day studying while 8 hours in sleeping and 7 hours in relaxing respectively.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response provides a clear overview and identifies key features, such as the high study hours in Japan and the more balanced distribution in the UK and Germany. However, there are inaccuracies in data reporting. For instance, you state that students in Germany study for 9 hours, whereas the chart indicates 8 hours. Additionally, the claim that UK students spend 8 hours studying and 7 hours relaxing is slightly misaligned with the visual data. While the main trends are captured, the precision of the data reporting needs improvement to reach a higher band. The response covers all parts of the task, but the lack of precision in data extraction limits the score.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5
The essay is logically organized into an introduction, an overview, and two body paragraphs. You use cohesive devices such as 'Overall', 'In addition', 'on the other hand', and 'whereas' to connect ideas. However, the use of 'respectively' is often misused; for example, when listing three items, it should follow the sequence of the data mentioned. Paragraphing is used appropriately, and there is a clear progression of ideas from the general overview to specific country details. The flow is generally smooth, though some transitions feel slightly mechanical.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing you to describe the data clearly. You use terms like 'allocate', 'noticeable', and 'priority'. However, there are some awkward collocations and word choices, such as 'balance time-management' (should be 'balanced time management') and 'relaxing had the least number of hours' (should be 'least amount of time'). There is limited use of less common lexical items, and the range is sufficient but not particularly sophisticated. To improve, focus on using more precise academic vocabulary to describe trends and proportions.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0
You demonstrate a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There are several grammatical errors, such as 'it is clearly show' (should be 'it is clearly shown'), 'relaxing had given the least priority' (passive voice error), and 'studying the same with Japan' (should be 'similar to Japan'). While these errors do not impede communication, they occur frequently enough to prevent a higher score. Punctuation is generally acceptable, but the control over complex structures needs to be more consistent to ensure accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
