Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-05
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The given bar chart demonstrates the typical weekday for students in three different coutries.
In an overview, the bar chart illustrates how the students in three different countries spend their weekdays. It is noticable that the students in Japan and Germany spend most of their weekdays for studying and the UK students utilizes most of their weekday time for sleeping.
According to the bar chart, the majority of students in UK, that is 8.5 % uses their weekdays for sleeping and subsequently 8 % of them spend their week by studying. The least majority of students in UK, that constitutes 7 % of the total student population manage to relax during a week. Contrastingly, the 13 % of Japan students uses their week for studying and following that 7 % spend their weekday time for sleeping. Only 4% of the total student population in Japan find quality time for relaxing.
Moreover, in case of Germany, 9 % of students finds ample amount of time in weekdays for studying and 8 % of students utilizes their time for sleeping during a week. Along with that, nearly 7 % of the overall students have given priority for relaxation during week days.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response attempts to address all parts of the task by reporting the main activities across the three countries, but the information is presented in a mechanical and inaccurate manner. For instance, the data is described using percentages (e.g., '8.5 %', '13 %') even though the chart displays hours, which misinterprets the scale of the visual data. The overview is repetitive, essentially restating the introduction without providing a clear, high-level summary of the distinct trends. While some key features are mentioned, such as Japan having the highest studying hours, the overall development lacks precision and accuracy in data reporting, keeping the response at this level.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
There is a basic logical arrangement with an introduction, an overview paragraph, and separate body paragraphs for the countries. However, the progression lacks clarity due to weak links and repetitive phrasing. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'Contrastingly' and 'Moreover', but referencing is sometimes mechanical and awkward. Paragraphing is attempted, but the separation of ideas does not create a smooth, progressive flow. To reach a higher level, the response needs more sophisticated and varied cohesive ties, alongside a more naturally structured overview that connects the data points cohesively rather than listing them in a disjointed fashion.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The vocabulary used is adequate for basic communication, featuring standard descriptive terms such as 'demonstrates', 'illustrates', and 'population'. However, there are notable lexical inaccuracies and awkward collocations, such as 'spends most of their weekdays for studying' instead of 'on studying', and 'least majority of students', which is a contradiction in terms. Spelling errors also occur, such as 'coutries' and 'noticable'. Attempts at less common vocabulary are limited and often marred by inaccurate word choice and preposition use. To improve, the student must focus on precise word forms, natural collocations, and eliminating basic spelling slips.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The response employs a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as 'It is noticable that the students in Japan and Germany spend...' and 'According to the bar chart, the majority of students in UK...'. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, particularly with articles (e.g., 'in UK' instead of 'in the UK') and subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'the majority of students in UK, that is 8.5 % uses' where the plural subject takes a singular verb). Punctuation is generally acceptable, but the persistence of basic grammatical lapses across complex structures prevents the writing from achieving a higher level of accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
