Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-05
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The give bar graph illustrates the amount of time spent by students in weekdays three activities which includes studying, sleeping and relaxing in UK, Japan and Germany.
Overall, Japan and germany had spend maximum amount of time in studying whereas UK stands in the lowest figure. However, Sleeping showed a opposite pattern in which Uk leads in compared to other two countries.
To begin with, Japan had spent the highest amount of time in studying which is 13 hours. While Japan and Germany had invest only 9 and 8 hours a week only.
Regarding sleeping, Uk leads with 8.5 hours, followed closely by Germany and Japan which is 8 and 7 hours respectively. As the graph does not showed a dramatic change as compared to studying figure but Uk has still the highest figure.
In terms of Relaxing, both Germany and UK spend 7 hours a week, while Japan had a least interest which is 4 hours a week. These indicates that Japan had less leisure time in compared to other two countries
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
The response successfully addresses all parts of the prompt by selecting and reporting the main features of the bar chart while making appropriate comparisons. An overview is present, highlighting the main contrast between studying and sleeping habits across the three nations. However, some aspects are unevenly developed or contain minor inaccuracies; for instance, the writer incorrectly refers to the data as hours a week rather than a typical weekday, and confuses Japan and Germany in the sentence about study hours. To reach a higher band, the response would need to ensure greater precision in data reporting and provide a more fully developed, error-free overview without misinterpreting the units of time shown on the chart.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5
The essay presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt at paragraphing, separating the introduction, overview, and body paragraphs dedicated to specific activities. Information is generally ordered logically, moving from an introduction to specific comparisons of studying, sleeping, and relaxing. Cohesive devices are employed, such as 'To begin with', 'Regarding', and 'In terms of', although some transitions feel a bit mechanical or repetitive. Referencing is mostly clear, though occasional lapses in logical progression occur due to minor data confusion. To achieve higher bands, the logical links between sentences and paragraphs need to be smoother and more natural, avoiding repetitive structural patterns.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The writer demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary suitable for the task, successfully attempting less common vocabulary related to data trends such as 'illustrates', 'maximum amount', and 'respectively'. However, there are noticeable lexical and collocational errors throughout the response, including awkward phrasing like 'spend maximum amount of time', 'opposite pattern', and 'least interest'. Spelling and word-choice errors also emerge, such as 'germany' (uncapitalized) and 'These indicates'. These inaccuracies do not entirely impede communication, but they restrict the score. Incorporating more precise academic collocations and ensuring accurate word forms would elevate the lexical score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The response employs a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some capability to construct multi-clause sentences such as 'While Japan and Germany had invest only 9 and 8 hours a week only.' However, there are frequent grammatical errors in verb forms, tense usage, and prepositions, including 'had spend', 'Uk leads in compared to', 'does not showed', and 'in compared to'. Punctuation and article usage also show occasional lapses. While these errors rarely completely impede understanding, they persist frequently enough to prevent the grammar score from rising higher. Greater control over verb tenses and prepositional phrases would lead to improved accuracy.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
