Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given clustered bar chart illustrates the information about typical weekday for students in three different countries which includes UK , Japan and Germany . It shows the comparison of sleeping , studying and relaxing activities . UK and Germany portrays similar kind of a behaviour overall in all three activities . On the other hand , Japan seems to be a outlier among other two.

The sleeping activity of UK and Germany students is quiet similar . Japan students on the other end show slight less interest in sleeping . Similarly the relaxing activity of German and UK students is exactly same . In contrast , Japanese students spends very less time in relaxing . The study activity of Japanese is impressive its almost double from German and UK students.

Overall all three activites are relatively same among German and UK students ranging from 7H in relaxing and 8.5H-9.0H in sleeping and studying . Consequently , in studying the japanese students are way ahead from other two country students where usually they range from 8H-9H there students spends 13H in studying.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You identify the main comparisons accurately: UK and Germany have similar figures, while Japan stands out for studying and relaxing. The key values are also broadly represented, including Japan’s 13 hours of study and 4 hours of relaxation, and the overview gives the reader a clear sense of the chart’s main pattern. This addresses the task and supports your comparisons with relevant data. However, some statements are imprecise: “almost double” overstates the difference between Japan’s 13 hours and the 8–9 hours in the other countries, and “slight less interest” is not a precise description of the 1–1.5-hour sleeping gap. For a stronger response, report the figures consistently and avoid interpreting time spent as “interest.”

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable progression: an introduction, comparisons of the three activities, and a concluding overview. Contrast markers such as “On the other hand” and “In contrast” help show how Japan differs from the UK and Germany, and the main ideas are generally easy to follow. This is a coherent overall arrangement. However, the overview is placed at the end and repeats points already made, while the second paragraph moves between sleeping, relaxing and studying without a clear grouping of the data. Some linking phrases, including “Similarly” and “Consequently,” do not express the relationship between the ideas precisely. Grouping the figures more deliberately and using a concise overview near the beginning would make the progression clearer and cohesion less mechanical.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “clustered bar chart,” “comparison,” “outlier,” and “ranging from,” so the topic is clear. There is also some attempt to vary expression rather than relying only on basic words. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or informal: “slight less interest” and “spends very less time” describe the data awkwardly, while “impressive” and “way ahead” sound evaluative rather than objective. “Activities” is also misspelled as “activites.” These issues make the vocabulary less precise and natural, although the intended comparisons remain understandable. Aim for neutral reporting language such as “spent fewer hours” and “recorded the highest figure,” and check spelling and word forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex sentences, including contrasts introduced by “On the other hand” and “In contrast.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but errors in sentence structure and grammatical forms are frequent enough to limit accuracy. Examples include “UK and Germany portrays,” where the plural subject needs a plural verb, and “Japanese students spends,” which has the same agreement problem. Articles and sentence construction are also problematic in “Japan seems to be a outlier” and “The study activity of Japanese is impressive its almost double.” Punctuation spacing and comma use are inconsistent. Practise building complete comparison sentences, checking subject–verb agreement, and separating independent clauses with appropriate punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.