Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The bar chart compares the number of hours spent sleeping, studing and relaxing in three countries: the UK, Japan and Germany.

Overall,It can be clearly seen from the bar chart that people in Japan spent the most of time studying, while relaxing takes the lowest time in Japan. In contrast, people in UK and Germany spent a similar amount of time relaxing.

It is intersting to note that, looking at the UK, people spent 8.5 hours sleeping each day, which is the highest figure among the three activities. They spent 8 hours in studing, while 7 hours are used for relaxing. In Germany, sleeping accounts for 8 hours per day, which is slightly less that in the UK. People spent 9 hours studing, and the time spent relaxing is 7 hours, which is the same as in the UK.

According to the Japan, studing takes up the largest amount of time, at 13 hours per day. This figure is much higher that in the UK and Germany. Japan people spent 7 hours sleeping, which is the lowest figure for this activity. They spent only 4 hours relaxing, as compare to other two countries.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You cover the main categories and all three countries, and the key comparisons are generally accurate: Japan has the highest study figure at 13 hours and the lowest relaxation figure at 4, while relaxation is 7 hours in both the UK and Germany. The overview identifies these broad patterns, and the body supports them with relevant figures. However, the opening describes the chart as showing hours spent by “people,” rather than students, and the overview’s claim that Japan spends “the most of time studying” would be clearer as a direct comparison of the figures. To strengthen the response further, make the overview more precise and compare the highest and lowest values across all activities, rather than relying mainly on country-by-country reporting.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs describing the UK and Germany, then Japan. This makes the information easy to follow, and phrases such as “In contrast” and “According to” signal relationships between points. The organisation is coherent, but progression is somewhat mechanical because most details are listed country by country, with limited direct comparison between countries within each activity. Some linking is also awkward, as in “According to the Japan,” and punctuation around “Overall,It” interrupts the flow. Grouping the figures by activity or using more precise comparative links would make the progression smoother and cohesion more flexible.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough task-related vocabulary to communicate the chart’s main information, including “accounts for,” “figure,” and “takes up the largest amount of time.” However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling, word-form, or collocation errors reduce precision: “studing” is repeated, “intersting” is misspelled, and “spent the most of time” is not natural English. Phrases such as “Japan people” and “as compare to” are also awkward. These errors do not prevent the reader from understanding the comparisons, but they show inconsistent control of vocabulary. Aim to use accurate forms consistently and vary the language for describing proportions and comparisons.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple statements and more developed clauses, for example, “In Germany, sleeping accounts for 8 hours per day, which is slightly less…” This shows some ability to combine information, but control is inconsistent. Errors include “people in UK” (missing an article), “slightly less that in the UK” (incorrect comparative construction), and “relaxing takes the lowest time” (an awkward grammatical pattern). The overview also has a punctuation problem in “Overall,It,” and “while relaxing takes” shifts awkwardly from the past-tense reporting around it. These issues are usually understandable, but more reliable article use, comparison structures, and sentence editing are needed for greater accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.